Supreme Court Hears More Conflicting Views at Hearing on Davide Impeachment Case

Manila Bulletin, November 6, 2003 | Go to article overview

Supreme Court Hears More Conflicting Views at Hearing on Davide Impeachment Case


Byline: REY G. PANALIGAN

The Supreme Court heard until late last night the arguments of the amici curiae (friends of the court), the petitioners, and intervenors in six cases challenging the constitutionality of the second impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide Jr.

The Supreme Court heard until late last night the arguments of the amici curiae (friends of the court), the petitioners, and intervenors in six cases challenging the constitutionality of the second impeachment complaint against Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide Jr.

Two friends of the court - University of the Philippines (UP) Law Dean Raul Pangalangan and former UP Law Dean Pacifico Agabin - said while the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the cases, the court should exercise restraint and give Congress a chance to settle the issue.

Senator Aquilino Pimentel, as intervenor in the case, said the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over the issue which rests purely with the legislative branch of government.

Deputy House Speaker Raul Gonzales and Rep. Salacnib Baterina, as petitioners in the cases, said that the second impeachment complaint against Davide is unconstitutional and the Supreme Court should immediately settle the issue.

The conflicting views and arguments heard by the Supreme Court since the other day when it started public hearing on the six cases involving the constitutionality of the second impeachment complaint and the imminent clash between the judiciary and the legislative branches prompted Justice Jose Vitug to exclaim: "God save our country."

As of 7 p.m., the High Court was still hearing the arguments of the rest of the petitioners. Also scheduled to be heard were the arguments of Solicitor General Alfredo Benipayo, and the lawyer representing the Senate.

A total of eight legal luminaries acting as friends of the court have aired their views since Wednesday.

Three of them - constitutionalist Fr. Joaquin Bernas, former Supreme Court Justice Florenz Regalado, and Court of Appeals Justice Regalado Maambong (all members of the Constitutional Commission that drafted the 1987 Constitution) - were of the view that the second impeachment complaint against Davide is unconstitutional.

Another three - former Senate President Jovito Salonga, Pangalangan, and Agabin - said that while the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the issue raised in the six petitions, it should act with restraint. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Supreme Court Hears More Conflicting Views at Hearing on Davide Impeachment Case
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.