Secondary School Curricula Issues: Impact on Postsecondary Students with Disabilities

By Stodden, Robert A.; Galloway, L. M. et al. | Exceptional Children, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview

Secondary School Curricula Issues: Impact on Postsecondary Students with Disabilities


Stodden, Robert A., Galloway, L. M., Stodden, Norma Jean, Exceptional Children


**********

Will standards-based education negate the benefits of individualized education for children and youth with disabilities? The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA; Public Law 105-17) and the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 legislated a number of new obligations for school reform. National consensus regarding standards-based reforms has been reached on three guiding principles inherent in federal law: (a) there will be challenging standards; (b) all students, including students with disabilities, should have the opportunity to achieve these standards; and (c) policymakers and educators should be held publicly accountable for every student's performance (Council for Exceptional Children, 1998; McDonnell, McLaughlin, & Morison, 1997; Wagner, 1998). However, issues arising in secondary special education suggest we may be heading in two opposing directions simultaneously. McDonnell et al. (1997) noted newer legislation presents a striking difference for students with disabilities because standards-based reform stresses accountability to apply uniform standards, whereas past legislation stressed compliance to apply individualized goals and instruction.

According to the American Youth Policy Forum (AYPF) and Center on Education Policy (CEP) report (AYPF & CEP, 2002), tremendous progress has been made regarding access and participation in standards-based curricula and assessments. However, 26% of states still report no change in students with disabilities participating in state testing, 12% of states did not provide data, and another 2% reported lower participation rates for 1999 (Thompson & Thurlow, 2001). The AYPF and CEP report also concedes standards-based "requirements that link promotion and graduation to performance on high-stakes testing could harm students with disabilities" (p. 5).

Nationally students with disabilities are still achieving at lower levels in math and science assessments (AYPF & CEP, 2002), as well as reading assessments (National Center for Educational Statistics, 2002). Cobb, Lehmann, Tochterman, and Bomotti (2000) describe the potential effects of current standards-based reforms as "extremely worrisome, since ... intentions appear to be heavily weighted on the side of improvements for higher ability students" (p. 16). Not only grades may be negatively affected. Another possible effect of reform could be an increased dropout rate for students with disabilities (National Center on Secondary Education and Transition, 2001) and a reduced rate of graduation (Defur, 2002). Although the U.S. Department of Education (Department of Education, 1999a) reported that fewer students with disabilities are dropping out, the number does remain approximately twice that of their peers without disabilities (AYPF & CEP; Balcazar & Keys, 1997; Graduation Rates, 1997).

Teacher concerns such as inadequate professional development, excessive paperwork, and attrition specifically resulting from these problems are likely to negatively impact the achievement of students with disabilities (AYPF & CEP, 2002). Forty-seven percent of special education teachers are reported by administrators to be insufficiently trained to use technology, and 39% have inadequate support to meet special technology needs to assist students with disabilities (AYPF & CEP). Teachers across the nation complain about paperwork taking time away from important teaching responsibilities (AYPF & CEP). The National Council on Disability recommends the IDEA include instructions for the U.S. Department of Education to review state regulations and assist states to implement the law where rules force unnecessary paperwork. Further, Robert Marzano (Scherer, 2001) recommends cutting standards by two thirds, as doing so will make it possible for teachers to cover essential knowledge in the allotted time.

Various national reform initiatives such as NCLB, the Goals 2000: Educate America Act of 1994, the School-to-Work Opportunity Act of 1994, and Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 assume challenging all students academically will result in better learning, teaching, and improved outcomes. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Secondary School Curricula Issues: Impact on Postsecondary Students with Disabilities
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.