A Mid-Term Grade for the Bush Administration: The Administration Has Shown a Strong Commitment to Developing More Cost-Effective Regulations, but Its Commitment to Federalism Appears Mixed

By Mannix, Brian | Regulation, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview

A Mid-Term Grade for the Bush Administration: The Administration Has Shown a Strong Commitment to Developing More Cost-Effective Regulations, but Its Commitment to Federalism Appears Mixed


Mannix, Brian, Regulation


CHANGING THE DIRECTION OF FEDERAL government policy is no simple task, even if you focus just on the executive branch, and even if you are the president, in whom all executive power is constitutionally vested. In addition to making wise appointments, the president must monitor and manage the departments and agencies. Every president since Richard Nixon has had some central process within the Executive Office of the President to review federal regulations and provide policy guidance and feedback to the agencies that issue them.

When President George W. Bush entered the White House, it was clear to observers that he wanted to pursue a different regulatory review philosophy than his predecessor. (See "The Clinton Regulatory Legacy," Summer 2001.) So what has the Bush administration done since arriving in Washington? What grade should we give its performance? By examining the administration's use of the regulatory review process, we can evaluate its attempts to change regulatory policy and the principles it uses to resolve controversial questions.

MIDNIGHT REGULATIONS

In the final weeks of the Clinton administration, federal regulatory agencies hastily issued a large number of controversial rules. On the afternoon of January 20, 2001, Bush chief of staff Andrew Card issued a memo freezing those "midnight regulations" pending review by Bush appointees.

One such regulation was the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's ergonomics standard. The Bush administration did not challenge this standard directly; instead, Congress quashed it in a rare--indeed, the only--use of the Congressional Review Act, which gives Congress a fast-track opportunity to overturn an administrative regulation before it becomes effective. The ergonomics standard had strong union support but was very costly and of doubtful effectiveness, and it had numerous opponents in Congress.

The Bush administration's cooperation was essential in overturning the ergonomics rule. An incumbent president typically would veto any bill that reversed his own administration's regulatory decisions; hence, the Congressional Review Act is likely to be effective only during a presidential transition, when both the new Congress and the new president may share a desire to repeal a specific regulation.

Another midnight regulation that was a tempting target for the Congressional Review Act was the Environmental Protection Agency's Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) rule. (See "The Trouble with TMDLs," Spring 2001). The TMDL rule requires states to set water quality standards for waterways and develop policies to limit discharges in places where the water quality is below standard. The rule had drawn criticism for expanding EPA's controversial discharge permit regime and for constraining the development of an allowance market for discharges. Like the ergonomics standard, the TMDL rule had numerous congressional opponents; however, a second attempt to use the Congressional Review Act to block the regulation was unsuccessful. The TMDL rule and other last-minute rules were left for the Bush administration to address.

The quick action by the Bush administration to halt the implementation of TMDL and other Clinton midnight regulations and provide for future review represented a good start, and at least provided the opportunity for his appointees to assert control over the regulatory process. However, after two years, Bush's appointees have made few major changes to the regulatory initiatives begun in the final months of the Clinton administration, nor have they successfully changed the terms of the debate. It is probably true that, under Bush, some of the midnight regulations will be implemented with more deference to federalism and private property than would have been the case under Clinton, but that is difficult to document.

Grade: Incomplete

GUIDANCE TO AGENCIES

All recent presidents have issued executive orders to establish the principles by which regulatory decisions will he made, as well as the procedures for reviewing regulations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Mid-Term Grade for the Bush Administration: The Administration Has Shown a Strong Commitment to Developing More Cost-Effective Regulations, but Its Commitment to Federalism Appears Mixed
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.