Not for Sale-Keeping 'Australian Culture' Australian

By Testro, Lucas | Metro Magazine, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview

Not for Sale-Keeping 'Australian Culture' Australian


Testro, Lucas, Metro Magazine


ON OPENING THE AUSTRALIAN Content Standard--the Commonwealth Government's main tool for 'promoting the role of commercial television in developing and reflecting a sense of Australian identity' (1)--you will find an unusual statement. Section 5(3) of the Standard proclaims, 'this standard recognizes New Zealand programs ... equally with Australian programs'. For those who are confused, this statement means that the Australian Content Standard counts programmes produced in New Zealand as being Australian. Consequently, Australian commercial networks can theoretically broadcast only New Zealand programming and yet still satisfy their obligation under the Standard to broadcast a certain amount of 'local' programmes.

This strange qualification always makes me uncomfortable when I try to explain to overseas visitors the bi-partisan stand taken by consecutive Australian governments to protect and promote local culture. It is included in the Standard because of the Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (CER), a free trade agreement between Australia and New Zealand which requires New Zealand and Australian goods to be treated equally, even in legislation designed to protect Australian culture.

Of course, the CER hasn't resulted in our screens being swamped by New Zealand content, mostly because New Zealand's production industry is much less developed than our own--it withered away after the New Zealand Government removed local content quotas in the 1980s, opening the country to a deluge of foreign programming. But imagine if the Australian Content Standard said 'this standard recognizes New Zealand programs and United States programs ... equally with Australian programs'. Then the ramifications would be very different. Australian programmes would be competing against a far stronger opponent to reach Australian screens, and the Australian film and television industry would be careening towards the same cliff that New Zealand's industry ran off a decade earlier. Something like this scenario could become a reality this year, as representatives of Australia and the United States of America sit down to negotiate a Free Trade Agreement.

Two rounds of negotiations of an Australia/ US Free Trade Agreement have been held to date, and an optimistic deadline of year's end has been set to conclude the deal. At the top of the shopping list of concessions sought by Australia is removal of current US restrictions on the sale of Australian fast ferries and agricultural products, such as beef, cheese and sugar. But the price likely to be asked by the Americans for these benefits is considerable. Come the next round of negotiations in July, discussions will shift for the first time to the audiovisual sector, and the US is expected to seek the abolition or limitation of regulation within Australia's film and television industry. What is at stake is not just the future of the regulations, but the future of the industry, and of Australian culture itself.

Australians have repeatedly demonstrated that they want to see Australian stories onscreen. Australian television has a proud history of local comedies and dramas topping the ratings, with Postcard Bandit, The Secret Life of Us, Kath & Kim and perennial favourites Blue Heelers and All Saints among the most recent examples. At the box office, blockbusters such as the Spider-Man, Matrix and Harry Potter franchises dominate, but Australian films like Crackerjack, The Dish, Lantana, and Wog Boy regularly achieve respectable returns, despite being made on budgets that are miniscule in comparison to the Hollywood heavyweights they slug it out with.

Popularity is not enough to guarantee survival in an industry with the peculiar economics of the film and television world, as a quick comparison of licence fees paid by television networks demonstrates. Most television dramas produced in the United States are fully financed by their domestic broadcaster, allowing them to be sold into Australia at a fraction of the cost required for an Australian broadcaster to commission a local series. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Not for Sale-Keeping 'Australian Culture' Australian
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.