NATION THAT BANNED FLIRTING; American Sexual Harassment Laws Are So Harsh That Now Even Women Complain They're Damaging Relations with Men. Ironically, It Is the Lecherous Promiscuity of Bill Clinton That Could End This Politically Correct Madness

Daily Mail (London), July 15, 1998 | Go to article overview

NATION THAT BANNED FLIRTING; American Sexual Harassment Laws Are So Harsh That Now Even Women Complain They're Damaging Relations with Men. Ironically, It Is the Lecherous Promiscuity of Bill Clinton That Could End This Politically Correct Madness


Byline: ANN LESLIE

WHAT California does today, the rest of the Western industrialised world does tomorrow. Here, in her concluding dispatch on the new backlash against political correctness in the state which gave birth to it, Ann Leslie describes how ordinary people are rejecting the trendy liberal policies that created the so-called victim culture.

LINDA Garcia left her last secretarial job in downtown Los Angeles because she had a problem with men. Not surprisingly really.

After all, 26-year-old Linda is a pretty, long-legged, bronzed young Californian with big hair and perfect teeth, so you'd expect a bit of 'man-trouble'.

But what drove her out was not her male colleagues' oafish tendency to fondle her breasts or leer at her from behind the water-cooler. On the contrary. Her male colleagues were, it seems, rigid - not with lust - but with fear.

A paralysing fear of losing their jobs if overheard by some busybody complimenting Linda on her dress, her smile, or her startlingly silver-peach nails.

'My God, life was so boring there. That company had a "zero-tolerance" policy on sexual harassment in the workplace, which meant even a bit of harmless flirting wasn't allowed - especially not if the man had a higher salary grade than you!

'I'm not saying I wanted to go round having office affairs, but I kinda felt like I was in a seminary of castrated monks!' But surely if Linda actually welcomed a few flirtatious remarks, then no 'sexual-harassment' issues arose?

'Oh my, you're so wrong!

Under "zero-tolerance" policies, if some other woman overhears the remarks and feels offended, she can complain to supervisors that she feels uncomfortable and "harassed" and take the company to court!' SOUNDS absurd.

But it happens: one firm was sued for sexual harassment because a woman overheard a male colleague telling a female co-worker a mildly dirty joke in the office.

The woman at whom the remarks were directed said she certainly wasn't offended, and couldn't understand what all the fuss was about - but her views were considered irrelevant. 'Sexual harassment' was deemed to have occurred because a bystander decided that it had.

In a 'victim' culture, anyone can declare themselves to be a victim, merely on the grounds that they believe they are. (As one sceptic here put it to me: 'It's tantamount to declaring that someone who says they're Napoleon actually is Napoleon, because they believe that they are.') 'Zero-tolerance' codes have been brought in because, thanks to the growth in 'sexual-harassment' cases often based on little more than the odd sexy joke in the office - companies daren't take a legal risk, however remote.

They have, for example, been sued by embittered women who, in the wake of a long and consensual affair with a colleague, have taken the companies to court for 'allowing' such a relationship to occur in the first place.

Sexual harassment cases are a highly lucrative boom-industry in American legal circles.

As, alas, they increasingly are now in Britain.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal government agency in charge of discrimination issues, presided over 6,127 cases in 1991, with damages awards totalling $7.7 million.

By last year, that figure had risen to 15,889 cases, with awards of $49.4 million. And that is the tip of the iceberg: innumerable other cases have been brought under individual state laws.

Mostly, though, the firms simply pay up out of court: even if they feel they have a strong case, the legal costs, the disruption, and the bad publicity make it too expensive to fight. The Land of the Free now has such rigid rules about the interaction of men and women in the workplace that it almost rivals fundamentalist Islam.

A graduate student in Nebraska was ordered to remove a holiday snapshot of his wife in a bikini from his study cubicle because a woman student found it 'offensive'. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

NATION THAT BANNED FLIRTING; American Sexual Harassment Laws Are So Harsh That Now Even Women Complain They're Damaging Relations with Men. Ironically, It Is the Lecherous Promiscuity of Bill Clinton That Could End This Politically Correct Madness
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.