Washington Targets Benefits in Fight against Age Discrimination

Management Review, August 1991 | Go to article overview

Washington Targets Benefits in Fight against Age Discrimination


The rising cost of employee benefits is a fact of life for every employer-big and small, public and private. Holding the line on costs is frequently in direct relation to the makeup of an organization; companies employing younger and healthier staffs generally end up paying less. As a result, those companies with an older employee makeup often attempt to curtail costs by offering different benefits packages to older and younger employees.

Late last year, President George Bush signed some of the most significant anti-age discrimination legislation of his presidency to date. By enacting the Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA), Bush set into motion the nation's most far-reaching prohibition against age discrimination in employee benefits. At the same time, the new law establishes minimum standards for employees who waive their rights under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)

Since most businesses nationwide are affected, it's critical that senior management review all benefits plans to avoid potential liability.

The new law became effective on October 16, 1990. Private, nonunion employers are required to bring existing benefits plans into compliance by April 14, 1991. Unionized employers have until the termination of existing collective bargaining agreements or through June 1, 1992, whichever comes first, to bring their existing plans into compliance. Special delayed effective date provisions apply to state and local government employers.

The major goal of the Act is to reverse the U.S. Supreme Court's 1989 decision in Public Employees Retirement Systems of Ohio vs. Betts that invalidated the ADEA regulations prohibiting age discrimination with respect to most employee fringe benefits. The Act provides, for the first time, statutory recognition of early retirement programs and sanctions them to the extent employers follow certain rules. It enacts into law the "equal benefit" or "equal cost" principle, which requires employers to provide older workers with benefits at least equal to those provided for younger workers, unless the employers can prove that the cost of providing an equal benefit is greater for an older worker than for a younger worker.

This means employees over 40 years of age must receive either equal benefits or have an equal expenditure made for them, even if the benefit is less. For example, employers could provide lower amounts of life insurance coverage for older workers as long as the cost of the coverage remains constant as the workers' ages increase. AGE-BASED COST-JUSTIFIED BENEFIT REDUCTIONS

Under the new law, an employee benefits plan (except certain retirement benefits) may provide lower benefits to older workers if the actual cost of providing benefits to older and younger workers is the same. The cost considerations need not be actuarially based, but cost data that justifies lower benefits to older workers must be valid and reasonable. Moreover, the benefits plan must indicate the actual cost of providing the benefit over a representative number of years.

Two types of cost comparisons are permissible-the "benefit-by-benefit" and "benefits package" approaches. Under either approach, the employer may not use more than a five-year age range in its evaluations, except in the case of health insurance. An employer is entitled to the age-based cost justification if the actual cost of providing lesser benefits to workers between the ages of 65 and 70 is the same as the cost of providing benefits to employees between the ages of 60 and 65. A benefits plan is not entitled to the exemption, however, if the employer attempts to justify a plan providing lower benefits for workers between the ages of 60 and 65 based on cost comparisons of benefits for workers between 50 and 55 years of age.

Hence, if an employer adopts a benefit-by-benefit cost comparison analysis, it must compare benefit costs at different age levels and make adjustments in the benefit amount of level on an individual benefit basis. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Washington Targets Benefits in Fight against Age Discrimination
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.