Stratified Whiteness and Sexualized Chinese Immigrants in San Francisco: The Report of the California Special Committee on Chinese Immigration in 1876

By Matsubara, Hiroyuki | American Studies International, October 2003 | Go to article overview

Stratified Whiteness and Sexualized Chinese Immigrants in San Francisco: The Report of the California Special Committee on Chinese Immigration in 1876


Matsubara, Hiroyuki, American Studies International


In view of all this we inquire, what are the benefits conferred upon us by this isolated and degraded class? The only one ever suggested was "cheap labor." But if cheap labor means white famine it is a fearful benefit.... If cheap labor means servile labor, it is a burlesque on the policy of emancipation. And if this kind of cheap labor brings in its train the demoralization consequent upon the enforced idleness of our own race, the moral degradation attendant upon the presence in our midst of the most disgusting licentiousness, and the absolute certainity [sic] of pestilence arising from the crowded condition and filthy habits of life of those who perform this so-called cheap labor, it were well for all of us that is should be abolished. (1)

--California Special Committee on Chinese Immigration, August 13, 1877

In August 1877, the California legislature's Special Committee on Chinese Immigration presented a report which requested Congress to strictly limit the entrance of Chinese immigrants to the United States. In Congressional discussions, the report warned of the threat of "cheap labor" and was used as a major source to support the Immigration Act of 1882, which denied the entrance of Chinese laborers.(2) However, to assume the issue reflected only labor competition misses the multilayered meanings of this report, and reduces the complex politics of San Francisco to a homogeneous Federal-level immigration problem. Certainly, the Special Committee criticized Chinese immigrants, allying itself with growing anti-Chinese sentiment. But, the Committee also inscribed coded anxieties about the white working class in its report. It did not limit its reasoning to the issue of labor competition, which would have drawn a clear-cut boundary between Chinese less-paid workers and Americans. The Committee report's concern with "cheap labor" intersected with a fear of "pestilence" and "demoralization" of "our own race" caused by "servile labor." (3) A close analysis of the report reveals the Committee's anxiety about the moral degradation of white working-class men and women. While accommodating the Chinese exclusion movement, the Committee also quietly addressed issues of social order among whites in San Francisco. Addressing these multiple struggles around the Special Committee report expands our scope beyond a history of immigration.

It is unknown how the Committee selected its fifty-nine witnesses. Yet remarkably, despite its ostensible concern for the working-class, the Special Committee interviewed only a few white workers during its fifteen days of interviews conducted in San Francisco and Sacramento from April 11 to June 3 of 1876. Instead, it summoned a wide range of middle-upper class witnesses. Public officials of San Francisco and Sacramento, including twelve police officers, composed a third of the witnesses. Six ex-diplomats, politicians, and merchants who had lived in China, six legal professionals, four clergymen, two journalists, and two doctors were also called. The Committee summoned eighteen Chinese men including six representatives of Chinese organizations in San Francisco. No employers of Chinese laborers or women were interviewed. (4) Based on these testimonies, the Committee presented its view on Chinese immigrants in a fifty page Address and a fifteen page Memorial. A 160 page-long Testimony included the record of those interviews. (5)

For these witnesses and the Committee, the meaning of Chinese immigration was not necessarily self-evident. In San Francisco, where four of the seven Special Committee members and the majority of witnesses resided, the Chinese were visible strangers but were not viewed as the only source of problems in the city. (6) It is certainly well known that Chinese immigrants were crowded in an enclave known as Chinatown. (7) Witness John L. Duekee, a fire marshal, singled out the district, testifying that "I never saw a place so dirty and filthy as our Chinese quarter. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Stratified Whiteness and Sexualized Chinese Immigrants in San Francisco: The Report of the California Special Committee on Chinese Immigration in 1876
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.