Not-So-Uniform Response to Fed's Disclosure Plan

By Lee, W. A. | American Banker, December 19, 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Not-So-Uniform Response to Fed's Disclosure Plan

Lee, W. A., American Banker

Legal sources are expressing mixed reactions to the Federal Reserve Board's proposal to set uniform standards on financial disclosures to consumers.

Last month the Fed recommended the application of a single standard for providing disclosures under five consumer protection regulations: Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B), Electronic Fund Transfers (Regulation E), Consumer Leasing (Regulation M), Truth-in-Lending (Regulation Z), and Truth-in-Savings (Regulation DD).

All of these regulations mandate in some way that disclosures be "clear and conspicuous," but the proposal would give a standard definition for that phrase. The question is whether that new definition would be stricter than the current ones.

Sources gave different answers. Some said the Fed's proposal would not establish a tougher standard at all. If anything, they said, the new rules could be easier for the industry to deal with than a host of different definitions.

Steven I. Zeisel, a vice president and senior counsel of the Consumer Bankers Association in Washington, said he did not believe the Fed was "trying to make any massive statement or change" to current practices. The proposal addresses "fairly technical" issues rather than "broad policy questions."

The Fed may even be trying to help the industry to reduce costs by simplifying compliance, he said.

In a notice published Nov. 26 in the Federal Register, the Fed wrote that a uniform disclosure standard "is intended to help ensure that consumers receive noticeable and understandable information that is required by law in connection with obtaining consumer financial products and services." Consistency, it wrote, should make compliance easier.

Though most consumer financial services and fair-lending laws call for "clear and conspicuous" disclosures, each regulation uses slightly different language, the Fed wrote. The proposal's blanket definition takes its cue from Regulation P (Privacy of Consumer Financial Information), which lays out the requirements for the privacy notices mandated by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

Whereas other regulations require that disclosures be "readily understandable," Reg P calls for disclosures that are "reasonably understandable and designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information" being communicated. The Fed encourages financial institutions to use, among other things, short sentences, bullet points, everyday words, active voice, wide margins, and "ample line spacing.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Not-So-Uniform Response to Fed's Disclosure Plan


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?