"Mending Fences on the Immigrant Frontier": A Call for Better Integration of Demographic Information in Human Resource Management Practice and Theory

By Jones, James R.; Lewis, Darryll M. Halcomb | Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

"Mending Fences on the Immigrant Frontier": A Call for Better Integration of Demographic Information in Human Resource Management Practice and Theory


Jones, James R., Lewis, Darryll M. Halcomb, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies


The authors argue that human resource management practitioners and researchers do not adequately take national origin into account when devising policies and theories. It is further asserted that this failure puts companies at risk for both lesser achievement of organizational objectives and potential legal liability (e.g., disparate impact). The background of the legal concept of a "'reasonable man" is discussed in order to provide a possible explanation for why insufficient attention is paid to demographic factors such as race and national origin, and implications for theory and practice.

Introduction

Three years into "Workforce 2000", the predictions of a much more demographically diverse U.S. workplace have come true. Whether looking at race, age, gender, disability status, or any of the other "protected class" designations, the proportion of previously underrepresented groups has increased substantially. One category that has seen a particularly dramatic rise in recent years is that of national origin, as manifested in the growing number of immigrant workers. Some of this upsurge has come from pre-existing sources, such as Mexico and Vietnam. For instance, in the years 1991 through 2000, there were approximately 2.3 million Mexican and 421,000 Vietnamese immigrants, who accounted for 25.4% and 4.9%, respectively, of all immigrants to the United States, very similar to their proportions in 1981-1990 (22.5% for Mexico, 5.5% for Vietnam) (U.S. Census Bureau, 2002). Other countries, however, are providing an unprecedented contribution to American labor rolls. As seen in Table 1, Somalia, Ukraine, and Sudan are but a few of the nations whose citizens are populating U.S. companies in ever-growing numbers(Immigration and Naturalization Service, 2001).

A parallel trend in many U.S. firms is a move to secure a competitive advantage through strategic human resource management (FIRM) practices (Hitt, Bierman, Shimizu, & Koehhar, 2001).Increased efficiency, motivation, and productivity are three of the major benefits proffered by HRM researchers and practitioners to result from such practices (Gomez-Mejia, 2000). Beyond the potential operational benefits, these practices often have a munificent component as well, intended to provide advantages to the employees as individuals, separate and apart from those accruing to the organization. However, managers often do not use knowledge relating to national origin diversity as a source of strategic information that needs to be taken into account when devising plans of action. When this happens, the two concurrent trends (i.e., increases in both international diversity, and strategic HRM practices) have the potential to conflict in such a way as to "backfire" operationally and/or legally.

Take, for instance, the practice of offering profit-sharing and 401(k) programs to employees. A primary objective of these plans is to, by distributing some portion of organizational gains and profits, recruit and/or retain employees, particularly those with scarce skills, highly desired in competitive labor markets (Vanac, 1998). An associated goal is to improve organizational productivity via improved worker morale and motivation (Kim, 1998). Consider, though, the case of Somalis. Somalis now comprise a growing share of the U.S. work force, with heavy concentrations in locales such as Minneapolis. Prohibited by their Islamic religious beliefs from accepting the financial interest that would accrue from these plans (Suzukamo, 2000), these African immigrants are theoretically forced to choose between honoring their spiritual dictates and participating in a company-initiated program ostensibly designed for their benefit. For organizations employing these Africans, the potential challenge would be to balance honoring religious practices with the inefficiencies inherent in administering separate programs for different employees.

Flexible, or "cafeteria" benefit plans are another HRM innovation of relatively recent vintage.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

"Mending Fences on the Immigrant Frontier": A Call for Better Integration of Demographic Information in Human Resource Management Practice and Theory
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?