Insurance Mandates and Health Care Costs: Requiring Insurance Companies to Cover Certain Services Has Defendants and Opponents

By Wasserman, Stephanie | State Legislatures, January 2004 | Go to article overview

Insurance Mandates and Health Care Costs: Requiring Insurance Companies to Cover Certain Services Has Defendants and Opponents


Wasserman, Stephanie, State Legislatures


Substance abuse and chemical dependency treatment. Colorectal cancer screening. Newborn testing for sickle-cell anemia. Is there a common thread?

These are three of the hundreds of health insurance benefits required by law. And they are the result of some 30 years of legislatures increasingly requiring insurance plans to either cover or offer specified benefits.

Today, state or federal laws mandate insurance coverage for more than 1,500 health services.

It's a dilemma. On the one band, lawmakers continue to adopt insurance mandates. On the other, they're eyeing, with increasing scrutiny, any and all factors that may contribute to rising health care costs. And they're specially looking at what role insurance mandates play, particularly on premiums.

Two trends are emerging.

First, a growing number of states no longer pass health insurance mandates without a fiscal impact study evaluating how they will increase insurers' costs. Second, a number of new laws are now on the books allowing insurers to sell cheaper policies that cover basic services, such as hospitalization, but not some of the required services.

Health insurance mandates affect the coverage benefits of more than 60 million people. Proponents of benefit mandates embrace them as useful tools for more comprehensive health care and consumer access to services. They claim that mandates improve patient care and protect people who work for small businesses from health insurance policies that have limited coverage. Opponents argue that mandates are a major cause of excess health care costs.

But whether the effect is costly to consumers remains debatable. There's evidence aplenty to support both sides of the argument.

PREVENTION A COST SAVER

One of the most compelling arguments in favor of mandates is that preventive services can save money through early detection of diseases. Researchers tout the cost effectiveness of preventive services, such as tobacco cessation treatment and colorectal cancer screening.

And yet many states pass health insurance mandates without such evidence. Only 15 states, for example, require coverage for colorectal cancer screening even though research finds it is highly effective at addressing the second leading cause of cancer deaths.

It's constituents who push legislators to expand health insurance mandates, not research.

"Consumers who have a condition or a disease or who need a service--and the coverage has been rejected by their insurance company--come to the legislature to ask that the benefit be added to the law," says Lisa McGiffert, a health policy analyst with the Southwestern Regional Office of Consumers Union.

In 2001 lawmakers heeded the call and enacted a record 65 such mandates. They passed at least 25 in 2002 and at least 23 in 2003. On top of that, many states are amending existing laws, and a slew of others are considering the issue.

PUTTING THE BRAKES ON MANDATES

While many lawmakers continue to embrace new mandates, others want to put the brakes on what they believe is a major contributor to runaway health care costs.

"I can't think of any mandate that I can support," says South Carolina Representative Daniel L. Tripp. "It adds another layer of cost to already astronomical health costs."

Studies back up his claims. The federal General Accounting Office (GAO) reported in 1996 that mandates accounted for up to 22 percent of average claims costs in Maryland--which has the most mandates among states--and 12 percent of claims in Virginia. An April 2002 study by PriceWaterhouseCoopers prepared for the American Association of Health Plans found that $10 billion of the $67 billion overall increase in health premiums between 2001 and 2002 was due to mandates and other government regulation.

But those figures don't tell the whole story for Wyoming Senator Charles Scott.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Insurance Mandates and Health Care Costs: Requiring Insurance Companies to Cover Certain Services Has Defendants and Opponents
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.