Was Spy Master Too Close to No10? HUTTON REPORT

The Evening Standard (London, England), January 28, 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Was Spy Master Too Close to No10? HUTTON REPORT


Byline: ANNE MCELVOY

JOHN SCARLETT is in charge of the "jewel in the crown" of British intelligence. A former senior MI6 station figure and senior MI6 official, he chairs the Joint Intelligence Committee, whose job it is to provide governments with clear analysis on which to base political decisions.

So proud is the JIC of this tradition of fierce independence that two years ago, it allowed one of its former chairmen, Sir Percy Craddock, to write a glowing account of its history, which compared it favourably with the more politicised intelligence of other countries.

But the Hutton Inquiry has exploded that myth of seamless excellence and independence from government.

Scarlett, as the drafter of the Iraq weapons dossier, finds himself in the dock for failing to resist the pressure from Downing Street - and especially Alastair Campbell - that its language be hardened to make a more persuasive case for military intervention. However, Lord Hutton seems to believe it was not "improper" for Scarlett to take account of No 10's suggestions.

Privately, Scarlett has always emphasised the contingent nature of intelligence - especially from countries as brutal and secretive as Iraq - but the dossier suggested something approaching certainty. He has been determined to prove he had "ownership" of the dossier and only approved those changes which he believed were true to the reports given to him by the intelligence chiefs of the various services involved. But the number of interventions from Tony Blair's chief of staff Jonathan Powell and Campbell suggest the notion of "ownership" was becoming blurred as No10 felt under growing pressure to make the case for war.

The question which has since loomed is whether Scarlett should have insisted on a clearer delineation of responsibility between himself and the government machine. Certainly many of his former Secret Intelligence Service colleagues believe he became too personally close to Campbell and Blair. The most vulnerable point for John Scarlett must be his insistence that he was unaware of friction inside the intelligence community about the 45-minute claim.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Was Spy Master Too Close to No10? HUTTON REPORT
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?