Historical Change in the Cognitive and Affective Language of Teaching

By Genovese, Jeremy E. C. | Journal of Instructional Psychology, December 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Historical Change in the Cognitive and Affective Language of Teaching


Genovese, Jeremy E. C., Journal of Instructional Psychology


This study explores historical change in the symbolic system inhabited by teachers. Every discipline has its own unique system of shared vocabulary and as the discipline changes so does that vocabulary. This study examined changes in the psychological process vocabulary used in the titles of 3.145 teaching books published from 1830 to 1999. Content analysis revealed an increase in the percentage of affective and cognitive terms. It is argued that this increase reflects the increasing integration of psychological insights into teaching.

**********

The purpose of this study is to examine if changes have occurred in the psychological process vocabulary used in the rifles of books on teaching in the period from 1830 to 1999.

In their history of teaching, Exemplars of Teaching Method, Broudy and Palmer I 1970) argued that changes in teaching methods are closely related to the larger trends of cultural change. They further identified several dimensions for understanding the changing goals of teaching. One of these dimensions is the cognitive, which they define as "linguistic and other symbolic skills needed (a) for communication and (b) for retrieving knowledge stored in the symbolic systems" (p. 41).

This study explores historical change in the symbolic system inhabited by teachers. Human culture can be thought of as a shared system of symbols that shapes both behavior and cognition (Sapir, 1949/1962). Every discipline has its own culture and its own vocabulary, Cremin (1977) has written of "an authentic American vernacular in education" (p. 83) that arose during the 19th century. Content analysis is a method for analyzing symbolic culture by making inferences from texts. In recent years, computerized content analysis has emerged as a valid technique for making such inferences. In computerized content analysis, words from a text are classified into thematic categories and the relative counts are assumed to indicate the underlying emphasis of the text. This technique has been widely used in the behavioral sciences to make inferences about both individual psychological states and about the symbolic context of human action.

This study makes use of the titles of books on teaching to make inferences about changes in cognitive language used in the teaching profession.

The Ohio Library and Information Network (OhioLINK) is an organization that links the collections of Ohio's college and university libraries. Many of these institutions began as normal schools and many continue to have teacher training programs. Thus, the books on teaching in the OhioLINK system should provide a reasonable historic record of the types of books teachers have read. While it is not feasible to subject the entire text of these books to content analysis, the titles are available in the OhioLINK catalog. The content analysis of titles is an acceptable sampling technique in content analysis because titles are a kind of metatext that represents the major themes subsumed under the title (James, 1990).

Method

Data Source and Preparation

Computer files containing the catalog entry of all books on teaching were obtained from the OhioLINK system. All information other than titles was deleted from the files and the titles were organized into ASCII text files based on decades. Non-English language titles were deleted as were titles after 1999. In the end, there were 17 files covering the period from 1830 to 1999 containing a total of 3,145 titles.

Data Analysis

A computer content analysis program LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, Pennebaker, Francis, & Booth, 2001) was used to analyze words in the teaching titles. LIWC classifies words into 74 categories based on a content analysis dictionary. For this analysis two psychological process dimensions were of interest: affective or emotional processes and cognitive processes. A linear time series approach was used to see if changes in these dimensions represented secular trends.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Historical Change in the Cognitive and Affective Language of Teaching
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?