Detaining Hamdi; A Crucial Test for the Supreme Court

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), February 2, 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Detaining Hamdi; A Crucial Test for the Supreme Court


Of all the actions taken by the Bush administration in the war on terrorism, none has been more controversial - across the political spectrum - than the president's empowering only himself to imprison an American citizen as an enemy combatant - without charges, indefinitely and without continuous access to a lawyer. This case, Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld, is now before the Supreme Court, despite the strong objections of the government, which urged the court not to take it.

The citizen, Yaser Hamdi, was captured in Afghanistan by bounty hunters in the Northern Alliance. He was allegedly caught fighting for the Taliban and turned over to American forces. A federal district judge ruled that the evidence against Mr. Hamdi has not been fully proved. But the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in an 8-4 decision, ruled that the president has enough basis to hold Mr. Hamdi indefinitely without charges and without any prospect of a trial.

Mr. Hamdi, in a Navy brig for two years on American soil, had been denied any access to his lawyer. But suddenly, on Dec. 2, the Defense Department announced that he would be able to see his attorney - just a day before the Justice Department was required to file a brief before the Supreme Court regarding Mr. Hamdi.

In November, during oral arguments on Mr. Hamdi's case before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, two of the three judges harshly rebuked the administration, signaling that the panel would find that the president does not have the constitutional authority - without the approval of Congress - to lock Mr. Hamdi up under these conditions. The Second Circuit's actual Dec. 18 decision stated exactly that.

Significantly, although the third judge on the Second Circuit panel supported the president's position, he did agree with the majority that the president, though acting as commander in chief in a military decision, did not have the authority to deny Mr. Hamdi the right to see his lawyer (whom he needed in order to help contest the government's case against him).

Accordingly, the government's abrupt decision to let Mr. Hamdi see his attorney seemed to be a transparent attempt to improve its position before the Supreme Court. However, the nine justices will still have to confront the Sixth Amendment question of this citizen's right to counsel, because the Defense Department has made it clear that giving Mr. Hamdi access to a lawyer at this time "is not required by domestic or international law and should not be treated as a precedent.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Detaining Hamdi; A Crucial Test for the Supreme Court


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?