Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Interplay of Wage and Exchange Rate Policies in Singapore: A Case of Collective Bargaining in Macroeconomic Management

By: Wu, Ying; Goh, Kuang Hui et al. | Contemporary Economic Policy, January 2004 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

The Interplay of Wage and Exchange Rate Policies in Singapore: A Case of Collective Bargaining in Macroeconomic Management


Wu, Ying, Goh, Kuang Hui, Lee, Boon Keng, Contemporary Economic Policy


1. INTRODUCTION

Adverse supply shocks often pose a dilemma for the Keynesian approach to aggregate demand management: Implementing expansionary monetary and fiscal policies tends to exacerbate inflation, whereas the laissez-faire policy stance is conducive to acute and prolonged unemployment before the economy restores its natural rate level of output. One way to avoid the predicament is to reverse adverse supply shocks with favorable supply-side adjustments, such as pushing down nominal wages. Indeed, as an alternative means to cope with demand shocks as well as supply shocks, appropriate labor market policies (including wage policy) are gaining importance in macroeconomic management. In the euro area, particularly, the familiar policy instruments, such as the exchange rate and money supply, have ceased to be available at the national level, and fiscal policy is also often constrained by the straitjacket that the budget deficit cannot exceed 3% of gross domestic product (GDP) under such circumstances, the more or less centralized wage bargaining processes that remain in place in some existing and prospective member countries are faced with the challenge (as well as an opportunity) of achieving wage moderation and flexibility in macroeconomic management.

Unfortunately, wages tend to be sticky downward and it becomes difficult to attempt to reduce them due to the existence of strong labor unions or the laws prohibiting such measures. (1) Furthermore the idea of instituting an agreement by unions and corporations to link wage growth with productivity growth, though attractive, often faces great political and economic challenges when it is put in practice. (2) Accordingly, in general there is a dearth of research on the effectiveness and dynamics of wage policy in an environment where other aggregate demand policies exist.

Singapore is an ideal case for the study of the effectiveness and dynamics of wage and exchange-rate polices, not only because it has actively deployed its wage policy in combination with exchange-rate policy for more than two decades but also because it has maintained a remarkable record of sustained economic growth with low inflation in a small, open economy. (3) Singapore imports more than 70% of its consumption goods, and imported raw material and intermediary goods are also important for Singapore's exports. Hence, policy makers in Singapore face the challenges of "imported" foreign inflation as well as the wage-push inflation that results from rapid economic growth and labor shortage. The exchange rate and wage movements naturally become the two interrelated key factors in maintaining macroeconomic stability. Specifically, the wage policy manipulated by a tripartite collective bargaining institution known as the National Wages Council (NWC) has actually acted as an important complement to the country's exchange-rate policy controlled by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) (Otani and Sassanpour, 1988; Wu, 1999).

The NWC is made up of representatives from the government, labor unions, and employer federations. Its main function is to select the rate of wage increase that is not only agreeable to all three parties but also compatible with macroeconomic targets. Although the NWC's wage recommendations only sketch a guideline for negotiations between employers and employees, both public and private sectors usually accept and implement them rather smoothly. The resulting collective bargaining agreements often extend to nonunion workers as well. Instead of bargaining unilaterally for union workers' wage benefits at the expense of nonunion workers' job security, unions act as an integral part of the NWC and often speak for workers as a whole in weighing real wage growth against unemployment. Particularly, unions actively promote sound economic policies to their members and support restraints when needed. In this way, the wage council helps reduce the frictions that information asymmetry and costly bargaining cause in supply-side adjustments.

Indeed, Europe has witnessed such government intervention in collective bargaining for years. The Nordic countries especially determine wages largely through centralized collective bargaining between labor representatives and employers. (4) Nevertheless, Singapore's NWC system has distinguished itself from the centralized collective bargaining in European countries in three aspects. First, unlike the intermittent European government involvement in wage negotiations, the Singapore government has continuously committed to its participation in the yearly tripartite wage-policy dialogue and agreements since the NWC was formed in 1972. Second, the smooth cooperation between union and nonunion workers and the NWC's effective tripartite coordination result in relatively small wage drifts (wage increases beyond those agreed on in the central negotiations), which are in sharp contrast to the large wage drifts in Europe. (5) Third, serving endogenously as an integrated part of Singapore's macroeconomic management strategy, the NWC has reduced government reliance on exogenous instruments such as fiscal policy and other nonwage income policies, whereas many European governments normally approach interventions from outside the labor market.

In an optimization framework, this article derives the MAS's exchange-rate response function and the NWC's wage response function and further analyzes the two interplay patterns of the two response functions: the Nash rule and the non-Nash rule. For each of the three potential scenarios of the economy: inflation, recession, and the so-called Goldilocks scenario (neither inflationary nor recessionary), the authors calibrate the analytical outcome, compare the simulation results with the actual quarterly growth paths under the two policy rules for the period from 1987:1 to 1996:4, and examine the sensitivity of the simulations to the bargaining power of wage negotiators.

The remainder of the article is organized as follows. Section II lays out the basic behavior model of the NWC and the MAS and derives the response functions of policy makers. Section III presents the estimation results and the simulation setting. Section IV summarizes the main findings from the model simulations. Section V concludes the article.

II. MODEL

The modeling strategy in this section involves two steps. First it specifies price and unemployment equations. Next it derives two response functions for policy makers and discusses the rules of the policy game. The specification of price and unemployment equations in this article essentially uses a variant of the counterpart equations in Low (1994), a study that summarizes the major structural features of the MAS model of Singapore's economy.

Specification of the price-level equation attempts to reflect the CPI composition in a small, open economy like Singapore. It originally starts with a weighted geometric average of unit labor cost (ULC) in the production of both tradable and nontradable goods, the exchange rate--adjusted prices of imported nonoil products (IP) and oil products (OP), and a random variable. By taking logarithms, omitting the random term, and adding distributed lags for each component that determines the CPI, the authors begin with the following price-level equation

(1) Ln(CPI) = [summation over (i)]

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?