Priestley's War: Social Change and the British Novel, 1939-1945

By Henthorne, Tom | The Midwest Quarterly, Winter 2004 | Go to article overview

Priestley's War: Social Change and the British Novel, 1939-1945


Henthorne, Tom, The Midwest Quarterly


AS ANGUS CALDER SUGGESTS in The People's War: Britain, 1939-1945, even though the Second World War is popularly regarded as a time when the British came together as a people in order to fight Fascism, in reality many people were opposed to the war and/or the way it was being conducted. Although measuring such dissent is difficult since elections were postponed, freedom of speech was limited, objectors were persecuted, and scientific opinion polls were rarely taken, well-documented government efforts to quell domestic opposition make it clear that Winston Churchill's Conservative-led coalition government considered it to be a dangerous problem. In addition to suspending certain freedoms, the government conscripted unmarried working-class women as forced labor, interned 27,000 "enemy" aliens, and took thousands of political prisoners. It also devoted considerable resources to the so-called "home front" in an effort to curtail espionage, sabotage, absenteeism, non-compliance, and sedition. The widespread use of the term "'home front" is very telling; the government was, in a very real sense, at war with its own people, or at least a significant portion of them. In an effort to win this war, the Ministry of Information saturated the nation with patriotic posters, pamphlets, and programs. It also censored news releases, entertainment, letters, and telegrams, canceled programs, and blacklisted performers.

For some Conservatives, government control of mass communications meant an opportunity to quell political opposition. As Paul Addison notes, Churchill, in particular, seemed to fear "that his own authority, and the authority of the Government, would be undermined" by Leftists. According to one of his associates, the Prime Minister considered "those filthy Communists" to be "more dangerous than the fascists" (Home Front, 343). In an effort to limit political dissent, the government threatened to suppress the Daily Mirror in 1940, and in 1941 it shut down the Daily Worker. Even the liberal News Chronicle was pointedly warned by the government to end its criticism of government policies. Similar efforts were made to limit political discourse on the radio as Asa Briggs documents in The History of Broadcasting in the U.K, and, in film, Ministry of Information censors restricted "the portrayal of class conflict, resistances and rebellions against the state, and criticism of government" (Landry, 27-28).

Of all the major media, only book publishing escaped direct government control. Although the Ministry of Information had the power to regulate publishers, for the most part it let them censor themselves and, as a result, books were one of the few media through which dissent could be disseminated openly. There were certain restrictions, of course; information about troop locations and the production of war materials could not be published along with anything else that might be of immediate value to the enemy. Such restrictions rarely applied to novels, however, since they were works of fiction. Indeed, the novel seems to have enjoyed special status as an art form: a government fighting for Truth and Freedom could hardly restrict the 'fruits' of a free society--in this case the English novel. Moreover, authorities knew from experience that regulating novels would be counterproductive since attempts to censor novels such as Ulysses and Lady Chatterley's Lover in the past had generated tremendous publicity and actually stimulated circulation. For these and perhaps other reasons, the government determined that novels were best left alone and, accordingly, assigned no one in the Ministry of Information to oversee them.

This paper argues that novels were particularly effective as ideological agents because they provided a medium for dissent when others were restricted or unavailable. During the war, Leftists such as Olaf Stapledon, Rex Warner, and J.B. Priestley were able not only to remind the working class that they were fighting for a new and better world, but also help shape their postwar expectations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Priestley's War: Social Change and the British Novel, 1939-1945
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.