Wrestling with Philosophy: Improving Scholarship in Higher Education

By Kezar, Adrianna | Journal of Higher Education, January-February 2004 | Go to article overview

Wrestling with Philosophy: Improving Scholarship in Higher Education


Kezar, Adrianna, Journal of Higher Education


Knowing is inevitably practical; it changes the known.

Sartre

In the last several decades, one of the methodological issues facing the social sciences has been the re-emergence of philosophy. As the social sciences absorbed the assumptions of the physical/natural sciences in the 1800s, traditional philosophical questioning about the nature of existence and humankind (ontology), how we know and what constitutes knowledge (epistemology), and what is the best means for gaining knowledge (methodology), became marginalized. Instead, one set of assumptions--scientific paradigm--dominated the academy. During the later half of the twentieth century, some commentators argued that scholarship was deadened by stifling the debate of philosophical issue (Mills, 1959).

Philosophical debate related to the conduct of research re-emerged with the ascendance of hermeneutics and phenomenological approaches to research, the development of critical theory (in particular the Frank-furt school of Adorno and Habermas) and postmodernism. Although each of these traditions developed and was absorbed into the social sciences at different time periods (phenomenology earliest, at around the turn of the last century, and postmodernism not until the 1960s), all were actively part of the social science dialogue by the 1970s. These three distinctive sets of philosophical assumptions were described separately and discussed as paradigms of research, and they dramatically changed the dialogue about appropriate research methods across a host of fields and disciplines (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994). A paradigm is basic sets of beliefs and feelings about the world and how it should be understood and studied (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000). It contains the researcher's epistemological, ontological, ethical and methodological premises.

The field of higher education emerged in the 1930s and became formalized with the development of the Association for the Study of Higher Education in the late 1960s, at the same time as the social sciences were beginning to engage new research paradigms and recommit to the importance of philosophy. One might hypothesize that because the field emerged in the wake of these changes and was not invested in a particular dominant approach, it might have been open to engaging these philosophical debates as other fields that emerged at the time did, namely, ethnic and women's studies, social work, or urban planning. Yet, for the most part, higher education research did not embrace the philosophical debates and the three emerging research paradigms; it mostly followed the dominant scientific paradigm. Over the years, more scholars have begun to use interpretive and critical paradigms, but philosophy has remained marginalized. In this short review, I would like to suggest the value of engaging philosophical questions while developing scholarship and in teaching research.

A significant problem in research methodology courses is that students do not examine and align their assumptions about the conduct of research and maintain convoluted and conflicting premises that produce flawed studies. Had they intentionally engaged philosophical questions up front, written out their assumptions about the issue to be studied, investigated their role as researcher, considered the purpose of research from the tradition they are working in, and probed what they understood as the nature of reality and how knowledge is developed, then their study would proceed with a greater level of clarity and focus. Instead, as many readers will have experienced, the students proceed muddled and confused. And truth be told, seasoned scholars could also benefit from wrestling with philosophical issues. Even those who have engaged philosophy need to revisit from time to time as new experiences or ideas shape our view. Sartre (1962) began his career as an existentialist but ended it more closely aligned with Marxism, blending the two and enriching both traditions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Wrestling with Philosophy: Improving Scholarship in Higher Education
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.