John Fletcher in 1600-1601: Two Early Poems, an Involvement in the "Poets' War," and a Network of Literary Connections

By Cathcart, Charles | Philological Quarterly, Winter 2002 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

John Fletcher in 1600-1601: Two Early Poems, an Involvement in the "Poets' War," and a Network of Literary Connections

Cathcart, Charles, Philological Quarterly

"We know nothing" of John Fletcher the playwright, "through the crucial years from eighteen to twenty-eight." So G. R. Proudfoot has said, and other commentators affirm this lack of knowledge. (1) Born in 1579, John Fletcher is likely to have studied at Cambridge during the 1590s. His first acknowledged writing is usually considered to be the commendatory verses for Volpone (1607), signed with the initials "I. F."; and Fletcher's full name is attached to a poem prefacing the 1611 quarto of a later Jonson play, Catiline His Conspiracy. In or close to 1609 the first printed playtext to name Fletcher as its author appeared: The Faithful Shepherdess. His first work as a dramatist may have taken place around 1606. (2) What of the preceding period? This essay will seek to recapture a sense of Fletcher's hidden years, first by presenting the case that he was responsible for two brief commendatory poems which appeared in 1600 and 1601, and second by arguing that the connections thus revealed throw an intriguing light upon certain literary alliances of the time. The second claim is dependent upon the first: if Fletcher did not write the verses in question, we still know nothing about his first literary activities. If he did do so, on the other hand, much more is achieved than a capture for the Fletcher canon of two minor poems: for he appears within a network of relationships associated with the production of homoerotic narrative verse, and he emerges as a player in the turn-of-the-century's contentions between rival satirists.

In the course of demonstrating that The Whipping of the Satyre (1601) was the work of John Weever, Arnold Davenport notes that both The Whipping and Weever's earlier publication Faunus and Melliflora (1600) "have commendatory poems by 'I. F.,' and the supposition that it was the same 'I. F.' in both cases is supported by a repetition of phrase." (3)

The poem published with Faunus and Melliflora is this:

   Methinks I heare some foule-mouth'd Momus say, 
   What have we here? a shepheards roundelay? 
   More love-tricks yet? will this geare never end, 
   But slight lascivious toyes must still bee pend? 
      Content thee Momus, thou hast lost thy sight, 
      For this is neither vaine, obsceane, nor slight. 
   If for to write of Love, and Loves delights, 
   Be not fit objects for the graver sights, 
   Then stil admired Chaucer, thou maist rue 
   And write thy auncient stories all anew: 
      And that same Fayry Muse may rise againe, 
      To blot those works that with us do remaine. 
   Then feare not Weever, let thy Muse go on, 
   Thy maiden Muse, thy chaste Endimeon: 
   To blazon forth the love of shepheard swaines, 
   As well in Cottage as in Court Love raines. 
      And whosoever shall chance thy booke to see, 
      In it shall reade ripe wit, sweet Poetrie. 
   I. F. (4) 

The verses celebrating The Whipping are these:

   To his friend. 
   You that come by, and chance this booke to see, 
   Peruse it well, and judge indifferently; 
   Yeeld him no more that made it, but his owne, 
   And give him leave to reape what he hath sowne. 
   But if it chance to stand within the sight 
   Of any time-observing Parasite; 
   Or any value obsequious Sicophant 
   Think with a bended front his Muse to daunt, 
   Him doth this little little booke despise, 
   And seemes as flashing lightning to his eyes: 
   In this as in a glasse, those men may see 
   The true proportion of their vanitie. 
   Then view him well, that with impartiall eye, 
   Dares scourge the Scourger of base villany, 
   And ye shall finde Wit, Poetrie, and Arte, 
   Each in his function play his severall part. 
   I. F. (5) 

Davenport does not suggest who "I. F." might have been, and neither does Weever's biographer, E. A. J. Honigmann. (6) William Keach, in a footnote to his discussion of Faunus and Melliflora, has proposed Fletcher, "who would have been twenty-one, three years younger than Weever, in 1600, and who had entered Cambridge (Bene't, later Corpus Christi, College, of which his father had been president) in 1591, three years before Weever enrolled in Queens' College.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

John Fletcher in 1600-1601: Two Early Poems, an Involvement in the "Poets' War," and a Network of Literary Connections


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?