Free Speech and the Market Economy

By Skinner, Joseph | Monthly Review, November 1991 | Go to article overview

Free Speech and the Market Economy


Skinner, Joseph, Monthly Review


The latest nationwide boycott of California table grapes launched by the United Farm Workers (UFW) of the AFL-CIO has resulted in scores of arrests on supermarket property across the country. Most of those arrested are what the union calls "informational pickets," who gather at the supermarkets to warn consumers that table grapes receive more applications of the most toxic kinds of pesticides than any other California fruit crop, and to explain the special hazards faced by farm workers when such pesticides are used. Through the boycott, the UFW hopes to compel California's wealthy grape growers to sit down with them to negotiate an end to the use of the five most toxic pesticides currently in the grape fields.

Most of the arrests are for criminal trespass. They prove what can happen when free speech runs up against its most formidable opponent in this country: private property. In court, the cases demonstrate that freedom of speech is more a political than a legal matter; that is, that there exists no transcendental legal guarantee of free speech.

Consider, for example, the arrests of eight UFW pickets in Austin, Texas, in 1988 and 1989. All were charged with criminal trespass. Four went to trial in the courtroom of Travis County Court-at-Law Judge Steve Russell. The case of the other four, held under Travis County Court-at-Law Judge Michael Schless, went only as far as pretrial hearings because the supermarket decided to drop its charges against the defendants.

The cases, though identical in terms of the charges, drew opposite opinions from their respective presiding judges:

Judge Schless: "When the free speech occurs on private property, you must balance the free speech rights of the speaker against the private property rights of the owner, and it comes down in favor of the owner."

Judge Russell: "The [defendants] were will within their rights [to be picketing on store property]."

This difference in judgment demonstrates that freedom of expression is interpreted variably and upheld arbitrarily, and is therefore still more a political than a legal matter.

David Kairys, in his instructive article "Freedom of Speech" (in The Politics of Law [Pantheon, 1982]), points out that no clear right of free speech existed, either in law or in practice, until a series of labor struggles between 1919 and 1940 finally compelled the Supreme Court to give it some formal recognition. The landmark case was Hague v. CIO (1939), which gave members of the Congress of Industrial Organizations the right to hand out union literature on the streets of Jersey City, the very "crime" for which the Austin Eight were arrested half a century later.

The Austin arrests show that despite Hague v. CIO, freedom of speech in this country remains under constant threat. One also need only recall the McCarthy years or the recent jingoistic moves to outlaw flagburning to realize the precariousness of the right to free expression. "Clear and present danger" arguments hang over freedom of expression like a cloud of paranoia. They would allow expression only if it is sure to be ineffective, and have resulted in laws limiting the number of pickets allowed during a strike, ordering the pickets to stand so many feet apart, and so forth.

The only conceivable "danger" the Austin pickets presented to the supermarkets was harm to their profits. The main reason the plaintiffs in the case presided over by Judge Schless decided to drop their suit against the UFW was because they could not prove actual damage from the speech; however, the judge made it clear that if actual damage to the plaintiffs' profits had been proven, he would have decided in the plaintiffs' favor.

Both judges are considered liberals, Russell slightly more so than Schless. Russell found the pickets not guilty, and went on to deplore the existence "in the minds of so many of [the notion that] free speech is deadly to commerce," implying that if free speech were so injurious, then the court's decision might well be different.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Free Speech and the Market Economy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.