West Bank Settlements; the Myth of Irreversibility

By Taylor, Mark; Rosenbluth, Marty | The Nation, November 25, 1991 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

West Bank Settlements; the Myth of Irreversibility

Taylor, Mark, Rosenbluth, Marty, The Nation

The Israelis have built so many settlements in the West Bank and Gaza that the process will soon be irreversible." This argument has been repeated so often that no one even stops to question it. The Israeli settlers use this claim to tout their own permanence, and the Israeli left has used the same claim to alarm people into taking action against further settlement construction. The notion that the settlement process is irreversible has passed into conventional wisdom. No one raises the specter of irreversibility more often than the settlers themselves. Dina Shalit, spokeswoman for the Ariel settlement, told The Jerusalem Report, "There are more Jews living today in Ariel alone than lived in all of Sinai before the [Israeli] withdrawal in 1982. The Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria is a fait accompli."

In its October 28 issue Newsweek stated, "The settlements . . . now make it impossible to draw a conventional border between Israelis and Palestinians. In effect, the settlers have won." But, are these settlements, as Newsweek claims, "set in stone"? Or is irreversibility simply a political fiction, a euphemism for the absence of political will?

Since the beginning of the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, Israeli policy has been to build Jewish settlements in order to create what Moshe Dayan termed "facts on the ground." The clear implication is that these "facts" are permanent, blocking any moves toward trading land for peace and thus creating a situation of de facto annexation.

Now that peace talks are under way, it is important to look carefully at the facts. Estimates of the total amount of land in the West Bank currently under direct Israeli control range from 50 percent to 70 percent (the government does not publish an official figure, although it has carefully mapped and categorized every inch of the West Bank). Even the 50 percent figure, put forth in the mid-1980s by Meron Benvenisti, a much-quoted expert on the West Bank, was high enough to help convince Benvenisti that the process was already irreversible.

Since the beginning of the intifada in 1987 the Israelis have dramatically increased the pace of land confiscation. Although no other researcher has been able to obtain the type of detailed government documents Benvenisti used to reach his figures, Israeli press reports based on leaked government documents indicate that "the State of Israel already owns [sic] about two-thirds of the West Bank land" (Yizhar Be'er, Ha'aretz, April 17). Some Palestinian researchers put that figure as high as 70 percent. Benvenisti recently told The Jerusalem Report, "In 1983, I said that the settlement process had become irreversible. If I thought so then, what do you suppose I think now?"

Whether the figure is still 50 percent or has climbed to 70 percent, these high numbers obscure a basic reality: Most of this land remains unsettled. While it is true that confiscated land is off-limits to Palestinians, most of it has been allocated for future settlement or is being used for roads, security belts around existing settlements, industrial zones and various military purposes. Without access to government maps an exact calculation is difficult; however, the actual percentage of Israeli-controlled West Bank land now used for settlement housing, according to both Palestinian researchers and Israeli Civil Administration officials, is probably less than 5 percent.

The Jerusalem Post, which takes a pro-settlement editorial position, recently reported that annexing "just" 13 percent of the West Bank would bring 70 percent of the settlers within Israel's borders. This figure, however, includes massive amounts of Palestinian land surrounding and linking settlements, and incorporates several Palestinian population centers, including the city of Qalqilya. Annexing this 13 percent would also give Israel permanent control over the main West Bank aquifers. But even in outlining a plan that would keep most of the settlers where they are, the Post acknowledged that "Israelis and Palestinians in Judea/Samaria are not inextricably meshed, making separation of the West Bank from Israel impossible.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

West Bank Settlements; the Myth of Irreversibility


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?