Saving Affirmative Action

By Forman, James, Jr. | The Nation, December 9, 1991 | Go to article overview

Saving Affirmative Action


Forman, James, Jr., The Nation


While many observers have come to the conclusion that affirmative action is in jeopardy, little attention has been given to why this is so. Perhaps unsurprisingly in an era of an increasingly conservative judiciary and an apparent Republican stranglehold on the presidency, most explanations have focused on attacks in the courts and by conservative politicians. However, the greatest threat to affirmative action stems not from attacks by the right but from its abandonment by the left.

To be sure, the conservative assault on affirmative action ought not to be minimized. The Supreme Court, for example, has continued to chip away at affirmative action's legal foundations. By narrowly defining what constitutes an acceptable justification for an affirmative action plan, by placing heavy burdens on a government attempting to establish the necessary factual predicate for a plan, and by rigorously scrutinizing plans to make sure they target deserving beneficiaries and do not unduly burden nonbeneficiaries, the Court is continuing to narrow the scope of permissible affirmative action. These developments have been accompanied by criticisms of affirmative action in the political arena, both by conservative whites eager to tap anti-black sentiment among the white electorate and by a growing number of black conservatives concerned about the stigma suffered by the beneficiaries of affirmative action.

Criticism of affirmative action by black and white conservatives is neither new nor surprising. However, the critics have recently found an unlikely source of support. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the conservative attack on affirmative action has been accompanied and nurtured by the collapse of affirmative action's supporters, who have shown an unfortunate willingness to abandon it and the vision of civil rights and government/corporate responsibility that sustains it. Perhaps the best illustration of this phenomenon, and the danger it poses, is the debate surrounding the Civil Rights Act of 1990/91.

The Civil Rights Act of 1990/91 was an attempt to expand employment discrimination protection for minorities and women, as well as to overturn a series of 1989 Supreme Court decisions limiting the scope of employment discrimination law. The bill was the main legislative priority for many civil rights organizations and liberal Democrats, just as stopping the bill was a key goal of the Bush Administration, Republican members of Congress and business groups. The principal opposition tactic, as has become well known, was to paint the bill as "quota" legislation. Opponents alleged that the bill would force employers to pay close attention to the race and gender of all job applicants, and in many cases hire minorities and women who were not as well qualified as whites under the employer's traditional method of determining merit.

Employment discrimination experts agree that antidiscrimination laws such as the Civil Rights Act encourage, and in many instances require, affirmative action. They do so by forcing employers to justify practices that disproportionately exclude minorities. If the employer is unable to prove that its practices are necessary to business, it must either abandon them or adopt affirmative action measures to insure that it hires sufficient women and minorities. In light of this reality, it is remarkable that nowhere to be found, either in the numerous press statements or in months of testimony before House and Senate committees, was a principled defense of affirmative action, of hiring with an eye to race. Also absent was any discussion of the well-documented inadequacy of many traditional measures of merit. In sum, none of the bill's supporters attempted to articulate a vision of civil rights that demands taking account of color as a critical element on the road to equality. Instead, the civil rights leadership abandoned the cause, explicitly denying that affirmative action was its goal.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Saving Affirmative Action
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.