A Tale of Two Reports: Research Suggests That Corporate Reports Are More Likely to Generate Rewards in the Capital Markets If the Reader Can Visualise a Link between Strategy and Areas Such as Employees, the Environment and Corporate Performance

By Thomas, Alison | European Business Forum, Winter 2003 | Go to article overview

A Tale of Two Reports: Research Suggests That Corporate Reports Are More Likely to Generate Rewards in the Capital Markets If the Reader Can Visualise a Link between Strategy and Areas Such as Employees, the Environment and Corporate Performance


Thomas, Alison, European Business Forum


Investors care only about the financial numbers. They are short-termists with models based upon the latest quarterly report. Right? Results from a recent experiment conducted in the UK by PricewaterhouseCoopers and Schroders suggest that this traditional portrayal of the investment process is far from accurate. Indeed, it appears that while the models generated by investors may be geared towards exposing the future earnings potential of any given company, the confidence that they have in this forecast--and thus the value that they place upon the stock--is based upon a far richer set of data than merely financial.

To explore this, PricewaterhouseCoopers approached Coloplast, a Danish company that is recognised as a leader in the presentation of total corporate--not just financial--performance. Whereas most companies supplement their financial reports with a simple statement of strategic intent backed up with a few, well-chosen metrics to illustrate performance, Coloplast goes that extra mile. It identifies--and where possible, quantifies--all the key activities that need to come together within the firm to implement strategy and then links these activities to their expected financial outcome. The information set presented is impressive, far outstripping anything that regulatory reporting models require. Such efforts have recently been publicly acknowledged by the Borsen and FSR (the Danish Association of State Authorised Public Accountants) which presented Coloplast with their award for best intellectual capital reporting. But does this corporate transparency make any substantive difference to the information user? Is Coloplast rewarded for its effort?

To test this, a PwC corporate reporting specialist dissected Coloplast's 2001/02 report and accounts. Through careful editing, a new version of the document was generated omitting all the quantified, nonfinancial, data that Coloplast elects to report. The result was a document that complied with regulatory accounting standards and that included the narrative typically provided in the front end of the report, but deliberately excluding the supporting metrics that relate Coloplast's operational performance to its strategic objectives and/or economic outcomes.

So armed with two versions of Coloplast's report and accounts--the original, complete document and the financially compliant document--the PwC team descended on the offices of Schroders, one of the UK's most successful investment management houses. Each member of the research team was presented with one of the two versions of the report and asked to use the information provided to develop a forecast of revenue and earnings for the next two years, to provide a recommendation for the stock, to support that recommendation with their key reasons and to provide their estimate of its beta relative to its peer group--a measure of their perception of the riskiness of Coloplast's return relative to its peers. They had two hours to complete their task--no conferring or external sources allowed!

The findings were quite startling. The average revenue and earnings forecast prepared by those with the full set of accounts were actually lower than that prepared by those who only had the financially-based document. This might be a little discouraging for advocates of greater transparency were it not for the fact that despite the lower forecast, members of the group with the complete information set were overwhelmingly in favour of buying the stock. This stands in stark contrast to those with the less complete information set. Although the average estimate that they generated was higher, nearly 80 per cent of this group recommended selling.

This outcome may be understood through a closer examination of the earnings estimates generated. From Figure 1 it can be seen that the degree of consensus surrounding the forecasts generated by the two groups varied greatly. Those with the full set of supporting non-financial measures, with the more complete picture of corporate performance, generated a much tighter range of estimates than those using just financial performance. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Tale of Two Reports: Research Suggests That Corporate Reports Are More Likely to Generate Rewards in the Capital Markets If the Reader Can Visualise a Link between Strategy and Areas Such as Employees, the Environment and Corporate Performance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.