Making the Case: Research Efforts on Educational Technology: A Closer Look at Scientifically Based Research

By Bailey, John | T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), May 2004 | Go to article overview

Making the Case: Research Efforts on Educational Technology: A Closer Look at Scientifically Based Research


Bailey, John, T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education)


HISTORICALLY, VERY LITTLE, IF ANY, research that meets the scientifically based standards as defined by the No Child Left Behind Act has been conducted on the effectiveness of educational technology. Clearly, the educational technology community most invest in research and evaluation studies to better guide the effective use of the investment, as well as to demonstrate to policy-makers the impact on teaching and learning.

In an effort to address the need, the U.S. Department of Education is investing more than $56 million to study the conditions and practices under which technology is used to document its impact on student performance. The results of these efforts should enable the educational technology community to be in the forefront of evidence-based research on educational practices involving technology.

Some of the federal funds are supporting studies at the national and state levels. In addition, the Education Department's Institute for Education Sciences (IES) is funding technology research at independent research and development organizations and at institutions of higher learning nationwide. Below are brief descriptions of the various federally funded research efforts that are examining the impact of technology on student achievement, professional development and other educational outcomes.

National-Level Studies

National Study Regarding the Effectiveness of Educational Technology.

The NCLB Act o f 2001 calls for a five-year, $15 million study of the effects of educational technology, using rigorous scientifically-based methodologies. In October 2002, the Education Department began working with Mathematica Policy Research Inc. and its partners, the American Institutes for Research and the Education Development Center Inc., to identify issues confronting a national study of technology effectiveness and to develop designs for the study.

A key part of the design effort engaged a panel of outside experts on educational technology, educational policy and research methodology to help identify important questions to be addressed in the study and to suggest possible approaches for answering them. Designing such a study is a significant undertaking. Since no study of educational technology has used experimental methods on such a large scale, important considerations must be addressed, including how the study's questions should be focused, how to structure the design for measurement and resource efficiency, and how to collaborate with schools and districts. Other considerations include the rapid innovations in computer technology, the changes in the educational policy context created by NCLB, and the goal of ensuring that knowledge from the study is immediately useful for contributing schools and teachers.

In May 2002, the design team provided the following recommendations:

* Question: What is educational technology?

Recommendation 1: Examine technology applications designed to support teaching and learning.

Recommendation 2: Use a public submission process to identify technology applications to study.

* Question: What is "effective"? Recommendation 3: Use experimental designs to measure effects.

Recommendation 4: Study the effects of technology applications for schools or teachers who don't currently use the applications but are interested in using them.

Recommendation 5: Design the study to detect "moderate" to "large" effects of technology applications.

* Question: What kinds of students? Recommendation 6: Study the effects of technology applications for K-12 students.

Recommendation 7: Study the effects of technology applications for schools that are eligible to receive Title I funds.

* Question: What is academic achievement

Recommendation 8: Study the effects of technology applications on student academic achievement as measured by commonly used standardized tests, and collect data on other academic indicators to provide a fuller picture. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Making the Case: Research Efforts on Educational Technology: A Closer Look at Scientifically Based Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.