Electric Choice Works in Pennsylvania: 1996 Act 138 Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act Title 66 as Amended

By Rewey, Christie | State Legislatures, June 2004 | Go to article overview

Electric Choice Works in Pennsylvania: 1996 Act 138 Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act Title 66 as Amended


Rewey, Christie, State Legislatures


THE ACT'S GOALS

* Allow consumers to choose the company that generates their electricity.

* Pass lower, wholesale electricity prices on to customers.

* Encourage reliable, affordable electricity and technological innovations by creating a competitive market.

WHAT THE ACT DID

* Creates competition at the retail level--for generation only. Competition was phased in from November 1997 through Jan. 1, 2001, allowing all Pennsylvanians to select their electricity provider.

* Allows the Public Utility Commission to set the "shopping credit" (also known as "price to compare"), which is a few cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) that companies can charge for generation. This appears on each customer's bill. If a customer finds a company that can provide generation for less than the "shopping credit," he saves money.

* Continues oversight by the Public Utility Commission to ensure quality of electric service, along with maintenance of transmission and distribution systems. Monopoly utilities still transmit and distribute power.

SEVEN YEARS LATER

California gave electric restructuring a bad reputation. But Pennsylvania's similar venture has met with more success. What's happened seven years after the law passed?

"Pennsylvania shows that electric competition can work if done thoughtfully and carefully," says Ken Malloy, president of the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets.

"Pennsylvania's program has been very successful in many areas, especially when you see the problems that some other states have encountered," says Representative Carole Rubley.

Pennsylvania began a gradual change from a utility system monopoly to a competitive electricity marketplace in 1997. Customers in almost every utility service area can now select from several generators. Half the states have passed similar laws, but Pennsylvania is widely regarded as the most successful.

Restructuring has saved money. Before the change, Pennsylvania's electric rates were 15 percent above the national average. Now, they are about 4.4 percent below the average. Dramatic savings exist in Pittsburgh, where rates are down 20 percent to 50 percent.

"We've returned to 1981 levels," says John Hanger of environmental group PennFuture. "Consumers are the single biggest winners ... no consumer is paying more for electricity than in 1996." Total savings for residential and commercial consumers are between $5 billion and $6 billion.

"I'm pleased with where we've gone," says Sonny Popowsky, the state's consumer advocate at the Public Utility Commission. "One major key to our success is that we took a conservative approach to restructuring. We put in protections so that even if things didn't go as we expected, consumers would still be protected."

The law includes a mandatory cap on electric rates and more help for low-income consumers. Rate caps helped keep prices stable through the transition phase and also shielded rates from price spikes in electricity-producing fuels like natural gas.

Not all the benefits, however, are found in lower rates. "Many have chosen green power, which is a new option," says Popowsky. Consumers who wish to support renewable energy are willing to pay a bit more. The new renewable energy industry has brought some $200 million of private investment into the state.

Representative Rubley says restructuring has done "a good job of keeping a cap on electricity costs." But lawmakers are disappointed that "we haven't gotten as many companies into the market as we would have wanted." Indeed, a limited number of companies have entered the state to vie for customers. And customers haven't shopped around very much.

WHY AREN'T PEOPLE SHOPPING?

Customers switching companies is one sign of a truly competitive market. It shows that citizens are shopping for a low rate. In Pennsylvania, shopping is made easier by the "price to compare," which electric utilities must highlight on customers' bills.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Electric Choice Works in Pennsylvania: 1996 Act 138 Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act Title 66 as Amended
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.