MPA Graduates and the Dilemma of Job Satisfaction: Does Crossing the Sector Line Make a Difference

By Blunt, Barrie E.; Spring, Kris Anne | Public Personnel Management, Winter 1991 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

MPA Graduates and the Dilemma of Job Satisfaction: Does Crossing the Sector Line Make a Difference

Blunt, Barrie E., Spring, Kris Anne, Public Personnel Management

This study examines levels of job satisfaction for MPA graduates employed in the public, private, and non-profit sectors. Findings are based on a survey and indicate that MPA graduates derive greater satisfaction with pay and promotion opportunities in the private sector than in the public or non-profit sectors. No significant differences were noted between the sectors with regard to work satisfaction or satisfaction with supervisor or co-workers. Further, no differences in levels of satisfaction were noted between four categories of public sector employment; federal, state, regional, or local.

Barrie E. Blunt received his Ph.D. degree in government from Florida State University. His teaching areas include personnel, research methodology, computer application, and administrative history. Professor Blunt has conducted a number of studies for executive agencies, legislative bodies, and other public and private organizations. He held directorship of a residential facility for children with handicaps and served with the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services as an administrator of habilitation planning. Professor Blunt has also published numerous articles on administrative history, organizational behavior, public policy, and empirical methodology.

Three basic employment alternatives are available to the NVA graduate: the public sector, the private sector, and the non-profit sector. One question in evaluating these options is potential for job satisfaction. In fact, previous research has suggested that there are differences in levels of employee satisfaction between the sectors (Rhinehart, Barrell, DeWolfe, Griffin, and Spaner, 1969; Rainey, Backoff, and Levine, 1976; Rainey, 1983, Blunt 1981; Caccioppe and Mock, 1984; Rainey, Traut, and Blunt, 1985).

The procedure for examining differences in employee satisfaction between sectors has generally been to survey randomly selected groups of individuals according to sector and contrast between calculated satisfaction scores. In an attempt to supplement the findings associated with these efforts, this study looks only at graduated students in public administration to determine if they are more or less satisfied in their chosen employment sector than public administration graduates who have chosen to enter the private or non-profit sectors. In short, the present study focuses exclusively on individuals with a professional education in public administration to determine if employment in specific sectors are likely to be associated with different levels of job satisfaction.

This is an important question with interesting implications. If, for example, the research suggests that MPA graduates are generally more satisfied in the public sector than the private sector, the discipline may feel comfortable that students of public administration have chosen a gratifying profession. If, however, it appears that public administration graduates do not find the public sector to be as satisfying as the private sector, the discipline may have reason for some concern.

Measuring Job Satisfaction

There are two widely employed survey procedures used to measure job satisfaction. The first is designed to present an overall assessment of the concept while the second attempts to measure various factors comprising the concept (e.g.; satisfaction with supervision, satisfaction with pay, and satisfaction with supervision). General consensus suggests that the more comprehensive approach - allowing the analysis of different facets of employee satisfaction - is preferable (Scarpello and Campbell, 1983; Cross, 1973; Ferratt, 1981).

The measure of job satisfaction selected for this study was the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) Smith, Kendall, and Hulin; 1969). The JDI Assesses the following five dimensions of work satisfaction:

1. satisfaction with the work itself,

2. satisfaction with pay,

3. satisfaction with opportunities for promotion,


The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

MPA Graduates and the Dilemma of Job Satisfaction: Does Crossing the Sector Line Make a Difference


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?