The Construction of Leadership Images in the Popular Press: The Case of Donald Burr and People Express

By Chen, Chao C.; Meindl, James R. | Administrative Science Quarterly, December 1991 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Construction of Leadership Images in the Popular Press: The Case of Donald Burr and People Express

Chen, Chao C., Meindl, James R., Administrative Science Quarterly

A social constructionist view (Berger and Luckmann, 1966) suggests that much about the way we understand organizations, as reflected in our implicit theories (Downey and Brief, 1986), is likely to be controlled by our interactions with social agents who affect the availability, salience, vividness or value of the information we receive (Salancik and Pfeffer, 1978). Leadership concepts in particular appear as prominent features of these socially constructed realities (Calder, 1977); Pfeffer and salancik, 1978; Meindl, Ehrlich, and Dukerich, 1985; Meindl, 1990). Consistent with these views, we argue here that collective conceptions of organization, and of leadership in particular, are expressions of a national culture at large in which both leaders and followers are embedded and, as such, are open to those institutional forces that create and disseminate "business" news and information. In this research we sought to explore the construction of leadership images as it is related to changing organizational performances. We focus here on the popular business press as an influential agent in this process.

The Importance of Media for the Social Construction

of Leadership

Many social analysts have recognized the importance of mass media in shaping views of ourselves and the world around us (e.g., Lippmann, 1921; Lazarsfeld and Merton, 1948; McLuhan and Fiore, 1967). Research in mass communication has shown that the media influence people's cognition in a variety of ways (Katz, 1980; Roberts and Maccoby, 1985). The media may determine what issues are important and set agenda for what the public thinks about (e.g., McCombs and Shaw, 1972), transmit knowledge and information (e.g., Alper and Leidy, 1970), reinforce or crystalize existing beliefs (Klaper, 1960), change existing beliefs (Paisley, 1981), and cultivate perceptions of the nature of social reality (Noelle-Neumann, 1973, 1974; Gerbner et al., 1978).

The last decade has witnessed an unprecedented growth in the level and type of media coverage devoted to matters of organization and management. Interested publics are now routinely served by various business media outlets, perhaps most conspicuously by a business press with mass appeal. According to the Standard Rate and Data Service, the six-month average circulation in 1989 of the Wall Street Journal was 1.93 million, that of Fortune, Business Week, and Inc. were .707, .870, and .754 million, respectively. In addition to such dedicated business publications, popular newspapers and magazines, such as the New York Times and Time, with their own huge circulations (1.17 and 1.68 million), regularly feature business and management reports. Such mammoth figures are complemented by the extensive reach and appeal of television and other mass media outlets.

While an ostensible mission of the business media is to provide facts and information about business organizations, it is clear theat business journalism extends into areas well beyond simple reporting, transmitting to us a variety of deeper messages regarding organizations and their functioning. Media analysts have recognized its ideological and constructive aspects (Caudwell, 1971; Gramsci, 1971; Altheide, 1976; Hall, 1977; Williams, 1977; Fishman, 1980; Jensen, 1987).

The media achieves its impact through its consideration of and interaction with the audience. News organizations are directly dependent on market forces and appeal directly to popular opinions (Schudson, 1978; Gans, 1979). To maintain the allegiance of the audience, news selection and treatment has to take into account its viewing and reading behavior (Gans, 1979) and be responsive to its needs and gratifications (e.g., Katz, Blumer, and Gurevitch, 1979; Kennan and Hadley, 1986). Furthermore, the interpretation of meanings by readers is not passive reception or discovery of what is inherent in the news but active interaction with the text involving pre-existing cognition and attitudes, previous and current expectations, and the nature of the perceived social and physical environment (Dervin, 1981; Swanson, 1981).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Construction of Leadership Images in the Popular Press: The Case of Donald Burr and People Express


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?