Adolescent Depression and Externalizing Problems: Testing Two Models of Comorbidity in an Inpatient Sample

By Evans, Allison Schettini; Frank, Susan J. | Adolescence, Spring 2004 | Go to article overview

Adolescent Depression and Externalizing Problems: Testing Two Models of Comorbidity in an Inpatient Sample


Evans, Allison Schettini, Frank, Susan J., Adolescence


In children, psychiatric comorbidity is more the rule that the exception. However, from a treatment perspective, comorbidity presents a serious dilemma: do you separately target each type of problem or is a qualitatively different approach to treatment needed? Research has not provided a sound solution to this question because it has not adequately differentiated between additive and interactive effects of multiple disorders or child dysfunction. In an extensive review of this literature, Nottelmann and Jensen (1995) cite a number of methodological difficulties but overlook this endemic problem. The typical research strategy is to compare levels of dysfunction among four groups: morbid for disorder A, B, both A and B, and (for comparison purposes) neither A nor B. This strategy confounds "additive" (A + B) with "interactive" (A x B) models of comorbidity, obscuring distinctions between quantitative and qualitative processes. A second issue that Nottelmann and Jensen do address is the paucity of studies utilizing continuous (rather than categorical) measures of psychopathology, suggesting that both are needed to fully appreciate the implications of comorbidity in child and adolescent populations.

In this study, we use data on depression and externalizing psychopathology in an adolescent inpatient sample to compare the utility of an additive versus interactive model of comorbidity using both categorical and continuous measurement procedures. Among numerous researchers who have sought to clarify differences among children with "pure" or "mixed" patterns of internalizing and externalizing difficulties, there is a growing realization that, in young people especially, these qualitatively different expressions of psychological dysfunction frequently co-occur (Overbeek et al., 2001; Zahn, Climes-Dougan, & Slattery, 2000). In the general population, rates of comorbid depression and behavioral problems typically increase from childhood to adolescence (e.g., Esser et al., 1990). These rates are further inflated in adolescent inpatient samples by referral and admission biases (Nottelmann & Jensen, 1995). In fact, conservative estimates suggest that at least a third of all adolescents hospitalized for psychiatric conditions simultaneously present with depression and conduct disorder (Puig-Antich, 1982; Ryan et al., 1987). We took advantage of high prevalence rates in hospital samples to examine whether adolescent inpatients with comorbid depression and externalizing pathology might differ in degree or kind from adolescent inpatients with one or the other. Related studies mostly have focused on implications of comorbidity for course and outcomes of the disorders (see Nottelmann & Jensen's, 1995, review; see also Somersalo, Solantaus, & Almgvist, 1999), relying on the four-group approach described above. In contrast, in this study we used a multifactorial design to distinguish additive from interactive processes, and focused on potential differences between comorbid and single-disorder groups in personality and functional impairment. An additive model posits that personality or functional difficulties associated with either depression or externalizing problems (or both) will be found in linear combination among individuals with both disorders. Alternatively, an interactive model predicts nonadditive differences in dysfunction, with comorbid individuals reporting higher (or possibly lower) levels of dysfunction than predicted from a simple combination of problems associated with depression and externalizing difficulties alone.

To appreciate the importance of this distinction, consider a relatively early but relevant study of comorbid internalizing and externalizing problems, which involved assessing teachers' and mothers' ratings of problem behavior among children identified as withdrawn, aggressive, both, or neither (Ledingham, 1981). Post hoc comparisons of the four group means showed that, on several dimensions, adolescents with both types of difficulties had more problem behaviors that those in the single-disorder groups, with the single-disorder groups differing from controls and often from one another as well. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Adolescent Depression and Externalizing Problems: Testing Two Models of Comorbidity in an Inpatient Sample
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.