Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

The Stem Cell Debate: A Veblenian Perspective

By Kemp, Thomas | Journal of Economic Issues, June 2004 | Go to article overview

The Stem Cell Debate: A Veblenian Perspective

Kemp, Thomas, Journal of Economic Issues

This paper considers both the developing body of technology that surrounds the use of human stem cells and the cultural reaction to this technology. The purpose of this study is to examine and test Thorstein Veblen's theory of technology transference using stem cell research as a case study. This application gives us the following thesis: Stem cell research, having originally been developed in the United States, will become encumbered by institutional constraints in that country. This will lead to the technology being further developed in nations with alternative social frameworks.

There can be little question that the debate over stem cell research is rooted in conventional ideas of morality. Despite the debate, most authorities agree that stem cell research offers the potential for significant medical breakthroughs. If the scientific predictions prove to be true, then nations that have developed a technological advantage in stem cell research are likely to receive significant economic benefits. The methods of the research are, in some cases, in conflict with the conventional morality of the American population. This conflict between technological development and morality has resulted--in the United States--in the restriction of funding for stem cell research. If the predictions of the scientific community prove true, the United States, having hindered development in this area, will likely lose out on the economic and medical benefits. This situation appears to fit with Veblen's description of the "imbecile institutions" that hinder technological and hence instrumental economic and social progress.

This paper proposes to use the stem cell debate to analyze Veblen's theories of institutional change and technology transference in three sections. The first section reviews Veblen's theory of technology transference, in particular Veblen's explanation of technological development, the cost disadvantages that accrue to nation's that take the technological lead, and the conditions under which "borrowing" nations gain. The second section considers the development of technology and legislation surrounding stem cell research in the United States and abroad. The third and final section draws inferences about the usefulness of Veblen's theory in analyzing the unfolding saga that is the "stem cell debate."

Veblen on Technology Transference

Thorstein Veblen's explanation of technology transference is an extension of his more general theory of institutional adjustment. As shown in the diagram below, this theory may be summarized as stating that technological developments force changes in the institutional environment as older ways become inconsistent with new modes of production ([1899] 1951, 192-195). Veblen did not mean that the resulting changes would be sweeping or instantaneous. Instead adjustment is, as Veblen said, "made only tardily and reluctantly, and only under coercion exercised by a situation which has made the accredited views untenable" ([1899] 1951, 192). Veblen did not see social institutions as mere reactions to technological forces. Rather, the influence between technology and institutions is, according to Veblen, two-way--each influencing the other ([1915] 1966, 29-30). To summarize, it seems reasonable to say that Veblen saw institutional change as an incremental process of adjustment between an ongoing technological process and the conventional social norms of the community.

Veblen further developed his theory of institutional development to explain technology transference between communities. Veblen believed that the fruits of technological development would be most fully realized in communities other than its original place of development (Veblen [1915] 1966, 24). This would be the case, according to Veblen, because the full utilization of the new technology in the home country would be hindered by conventional norms and understandings (27). These conventional norms, according to Veblen, would affect development in two ways: first, the home economy would have a limited perspective on the use of the technology and, second, the home country will have had more time to develop institutions that place direct limitations on technological development.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

The Stem Cell Debate: A Veblenian Perspective


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.