Sherman's Great Compromise: Roger Sherman's Brilliant Proposal Saved the 1787 Constitutional Convention from a Hopeless Deadlock and Safeguarded against Centralization of Power at the Federal Level

By Eddlem, Thomas R. | The New American, June 28, 2004 | Go to article overview

Sherman's Great Compromise: Roger Sherman's Brilliant Proposal Saved the 1787 Constitutional Convention from a Hopeless Deadlock and Safeguarded against Centralization of Power at the Federal Level


Eddlem, Thomas R., The New American


The stifling early summer heat in Philadelphia seemed apropos for the increasingly heated debate among the Constitutional Convention delegates. By early June 1787, the convention appeared hopelessly deadlocked. Delegates from the larger states wanted the new Constitution to apportion congressional representation by population, while those from the smaller states wanted to continue congressional representation by states as under the Articles of Confederation.

Virginia's James Madison and New York's Gouverneur Morris led the argument for representation by population. Madison called pure representation of the states "unjust" and "did not conceive any effectual system could be substituted on any other basis than that of a proportional suffrage."

Delegates from the smaller states countered that their states "may be injured at pleasure without redress," in the words of Delaware's Gunning Bedford Jr. "In this case Delaware would have about one-ninetieth for its share in the general councils; whilst Pennsylvania and Virginia would possess one-third of the whole," Bedford pointed out. "Is there no difference of interests, no rival ship of commerce, of manufactures? Will not these large States crush the small ones, whenever they stand in the way of their ambitious or interested views? This shows the impossibility of adopting such a system as that on the table, or any other founded on a change in the principle of representation."

More than any other issue, the great debate as to how to apportion representation in Congress threatened to break apart the Convention before it could produce a new Constitution.

On Monday, June 11. Roger Sherman, Connecticut's senior delegate, proposed a compromise that, he hoped, would protect the smaller states while giving representation to each man. He proposed a bicameral legislature where "the proportion of suffrage in the first branch [the House of Representatives] should be according to the respective numbers of free inhabitants; and that in the second branch, or Senate, each State should have one vote and no more."

Before Sherman had submitted his proposal, Benjamin Franklin had written a letter warning against hot-headed debate about congressional representation. After the proposal was submitted, Franklin asked that James Wilson read his letter, which stated: "[T]ill this point, the proportion of representation, came before us, our debates were carried on with great coolness and temper. If any thing of a contrary kind has on this occasion appeared, I hope it will not be repeated; for we are sent here to consult, not to contend, with each other; and declarations of a fixed opinion, and of determined resolution never to change it, neither enlighten nor convince us."

Not surprisingly, Sherman's proposal, which became known as the "Connecticut Compromise," or the Great Compromise, was met with a flurry of spirited and tense debate. "Everything," Sherman warned the delegates in his stunted style, "depended on this. The smaller states would never agree to the plan on any other principle than an equality of suffrage in this branch."

The 66-year-old Sherman was an old hand at the workings of Congress. He had logged in more time as a congressman than any other man, serving from the first Continental Congress in 1774 every year through 1784, except for 1782. In 1776, when the Continental Congress was drawing up the Articles of Confederation, Sherman had suggested a similar arrangement. But the Continental Congress of 1776 was then more interested in promoting independence for the states that had broken away from Great Britain than in forming a strong union among those states. Perhaps no man was more aware of the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, and more convinced of the need for a stronger union, than Sherman. "The question is, not what rights naturally belong to man," he told the delegates, "but how they may be most equally and effectually guarded in society.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sherman's Great Compromise: Roger Sherman's Brilliant Proposal Saved the 1787 Constitutional Convention from a Hopeless Deadlock and Safeguarded against Centralization of Power at the Federal Level
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.