Hard Corps Revival on the Kissimmee: Can the Army's Engineers March to Nature's Drummer?

By Hamilton, Joan | Sierra, March-April 1992 | Go to article overview

Hard Corps Revival on the Kissimmee: Can the Army's Engineers March to Nature's Drummer?


Hamilton, Joan, Sierra


Can the Army's engineers march to nature's drummer?

In the 1960s the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers diverted the flow of the sinuous Kissimmee River into a huge concrete ditch. Once a bearer of pure water to Lake Okeechobee and the Everglades, the river and its hundred miles of meanders stagnated, and Canal 38 was born--a 50-mile-long straight shot through the heart of central Florida.

"The Ditch," as environmentalists derisively dubbed it, was scarcely complete before it started to look like an engineering Jekyll and Hyde. It worked well enough for flood control --the project's raison d'etre--but its effects on the area's once-abundant waterfowl and fish were monstrous. By the mid-1970s the Kissimmee's ibis and eagles were almost gone. Also belly-up were 6 billion freshwater shrimp and six species of fish. The 200,000 acres of marshland the river once fed were replaced by dairy herds and dust. Its flows were polluted by farm runoff; they also became erratic--too high in the rainy season and too low in the dry.

The state's governor and its congressional delegation came to view Canal 38 as a costly mistake that jeopardized not only wildlife and parks but also the water needed to sustain Florida's growing human population. Starting in the early 1970s the state went back to the Corps at regular intervals, asking for a reversal of its magic. The Army engineers balked: Why should they tear down what had taken ten years and $30 million to build?

The Corps had other philosophical qualms as well. For years this public-works branch of the Army has battled steadfastly against nature, not for it. Founded in 1802, the Corps took on civilian duties in addition to its military work in 1824, building the dams, levees, bridges, and channels that the developing nation demanded. In its heyday, the Corps was regarded as almost heroic, the ultimate in can-do efficiency, with everything from small-town reservoirs to the Washington Monument, the Panama Canal, and the Manhattan Project in its mission-accomplished file.

By the 1960s, however, the cheers were muffled by jeers from people concerned about the dark side of the Corps' triumphs: rivers imprisoned, wetlands lost, canyons flooded. (Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas once went so far as to call the Corps "public enemy number one.") In 1970 the Corps bowed to criticism, promising in new guidelines to "give environmental values the full consideration that is their due."

The Corps' green pronouncements continued throughout the 1970s and '80s, but the agency still seemed unclear on the Kissimmee concept. In 1985 the Corps recommended that the river not be restored, citing a lack of economic benefits. Congress came back with legislation in 1986 that specifically instructed the Corps to undertake such restoration projects--in fact that it couldn't precisely calculate the dollar value of a wild duck or a meandering stream.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Hard Corps Revival on the Kissimmee: Can the Army's Engineers March to Nature's Drummer?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.