Supreme Court in 13-0 Unanimous Decision Reinstates 9 Tax Evasion Cases against Lucio Tan, 69 Associates

Manila Bulletin, July 14, 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Supreme Court in 13-0 Unanimous Decision Reinstates 9 Tax Evasion Cases against Lucio Tan, 69 Associates


The Supreme Court, in a 13-0 vote, reinstated yesterday the nine tax evasion cases involving R25.6 billion against businessman Lucio C. Tan, his 10 companies, and 69 of his business associates and ordered Branch 75 of the Marikina City metropolitan trial court (MeTC) to institute appropriate proceedings.

Tans criminal cases, denominated as 98-38181 to 98-38189, were filed by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in 1993 and charging him, his firms, and his associates with fraud in the payment of ad valorem, deficiency income, and value added taxes for the years 1990, 1991, and 1992.

After a round in all levels of the prosecution service and the judiciary, the cases were brought anew by the government before the Supreme Court on an issue of technicality used by the trial court in dismissing the cases.

Lt. Gen. (ret.) Salvador M. Mison issued the following statement:

"As spokesman for the Lucio C. Tan Group of Companies, I would like to respectfully beg off from making any comment at this time regarding the Supreme Court decision on the Lucio Tan tax case.

"We have yet to receive and read a copy of the decision. Thus it would be difficult, if not impossible, to issue an intelligent comment.

"Thank you very much for your kind understanding."

In a 34-page decision written by Justice Adolfo Azcuna, the High Court ruled that "criminal cases Nos. 98-38181 to 98-38189 are hereby remanded to the Metropolitan TrialCourt (MTC), Branch 75, Marikina City, for appropriate proceedings."

"Wherefore, the petition is granted and the decision of the Court of Appeals dated Aug. 29, 2000 in CAGR SP No. 56077 and the orders of the regional trial court of Marikina City dated Aug. 25, 1999 and Oct. 13, 1999 in SCA Case No. 95-340-MK are hereby reversed, and the orders dated March 22, 1999 and May 17, 1999 of the metropolitan trial court, Branch 75, Marikina City, dismissing the criminal informations filed by the DoJ (Department of Justice) panel against herein respondents, and denying the DoJ panels motion for reconsideration, are hereby declared null and void and set aside, and the criminal informations are reinstated," the High Court said.

Concurring with Azcuna were Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr., Senior Justice Reynato Puno, and Justices Jose Vitug (in the result), Artemio Panganiban, Leonardo Quisumbing (in the result), Consuelo Ynares Santiago, Angelina Sandoval Gutierrez, Ma. Alicia Austria Martinez, Renato Corona, Conchita Carpio Morales, Romeo Callejo Sr., and Dante Tinga. Justice Antonio Carpio did not take part saying he was former presidential legal counsel and had made some recommendations on Tans cases.

Accused in the cases involving violations of the National Internal Revenu Code (NIRC), aside from Tan, were Antonio Abaya, Harry Tan, Carmen Khao Tan, Florencio Santos, Salvador Mison, Roxas Chua, Mariano Tanenglian, and Juanita Lee of Fortune Tobocco Corp.;

William Yu, Leticia Lim, Gloria Lopez, Robert Tantampo, Jose Tiu, Felipe Loy, and Luis See of Townsman Commercial Inc.;

Rolando Chua, Honorina Tan, Millie Tantamco, Henry Wechee, Jesus Lim, Teodoro Tan, Antonio Apostol, and Domingo Teng of Landmark Sales and Marketing Inc.;

Candelario Li, Teodoro Tan, Erlinda Cruz, Carlos Tumpalan, Larry John Sy, Ernesto Ong, and Wilfredo Macrohon of Crimson Croker Distributors Inc.;

Nemesio Tan, Quintin Calaleja, Yolanda Manalili, Carlos Chan, Romeo Tan, John Uy, and Vicente Co of Dagupan Combined Commodities Inc.;

Henry Choa, Lope Lim Guan, Emilio Tan, Felipe Tan, She Chuan, and Andres Co of First Union Trading Corp.;

Felipe Kee, Henry Go Co, Narciso Go, Adolfo Lim, Maximo Tan, Co Shu, and Daniel Yao of Carlsburg and Sons Inc.;

Gabriel Quientella, Nelson Te, Emilio Go, Edwin Lee, Cesar Ledesma Jr., and Jao Chep Seng of Omar Ali Distributors, Inc.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Supreme Court in 13-0 Unanimous Decision Reinstates 9 Tax Evasion Cases against Lucio Tan, 69 Associates


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?