Where Standpoint Stands Now: An Introduction and Commentary

By Hallstein, D. Lynn, O'Brien | Women's Studies in Communication, Winter 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Where Standpoint Stands Now: An Introduction and Commentary


Hallstein, D. Lynn, O'Brien, Women's Studies in Communication


Nancy Hartsock's article, "The feminist standpoint: Towards a specifically feminist historical materialism," in Discovering Reality (1983), is often described as the locus classicus of feminist standpoint theory. Although there were other scholars also working on standpoint theory (Jaggar, 1983; Smith, 1974, 1987; Rose, 1983), Hartsock's work is thought of in this way because it is the origin of the term "feminist standpoint theory." From the moment Hartsock defined it, feminist standpoint theory has been at the center of highly theoretical discussions, some bordering on contentious. There are, for example, nuanced theoretical discussions/ articles about the empiricism--the view that knowledge depends on experience--and epistemology of feminist standpoint theory (Bar On, 1993; Campbell, 1994; Harding, 1991; Hartsock, 1983, 1990a, 1990b; Janack, 1997; Longine, 1993), about its postmodernism or lack thereof (Harding, 1991, 1997; Hartsock, 1997a; Hekman, 1997a; O'Brien Hallstein, 1999), the relationship between identity and politics in feminist standpoint theory (O'Leary, 1997) and about its relationship to materialism (Hirschmann, 1997).

Kenny (1997) notes that these nuanced debates are difficult to understand fully, even for the theoretically well educated. Moreover, Kenny explains that her experience teaching it has been complicated because "many students lacked a basic vocabulary and facility with philosophical concepts. They were interested in feminism but knew little about materialism, liberalism, psychoanalysis, postmodernism, or, most importantly, epistemology" (p. 1). This difficulty is complicated by the recent response of several key feminist standpoint theorists to criticism of their work. In response to Hekman's (1997a) recent critique and reconceptualization of key components of feminist standpoint theory, many of the founding theorists (Hartsock, 1997a; Harding, 1997; Collins, 1997; Smith, 1997) claim that much of their work has been misunderstood by Hekman and other feminist scholars. This response prompted Kenny to note, rightfully, that the "confusion and disagreement about interpretation and meaning is not confined to novices" (p. 1).

Thus, it should come as no surprise that feminist standpoint theory has not been used in a great deal of research. Why, then, do a significant number of communication scholars across areas (Allen, 1998; Bullis, 1993; Buzzanell, 1994; Makau, 1997; O'Brien Hallstein, 1999; Pointer and Young, 1997; Stewart, 1997; Wood, 1992, 1997), and as Hirschmann (1997) notes, scholars across disciplines--philosophy, social work, sociology, psychology, history, geography, and the biological and physical sciences--continue to suggest that we ought to use feminist standpoint theory in research? Moreover, Why would Women's Studies in Communication devote this special issue to feminist standpoint theory? The primary answer is that feminist standpoint theory--with all its theoretical complexity and potential for obscurity--is grappling with the controversies that will define the heart and soul of feminist scholarship in the next century.

Because they are attempting to use feminist standpoint theory in research, the authors in this special issue are implicitly participating in this history making. Understanding how they are doing so requires some historical background and a discussion of the basic tenets of feminist standpoint theory. This understanding also requires that I situate feminist standpoint theory in both its historical and feminist contexts and that I sketch the core tenets of current versions of feminist standpoint theory. Finally, I comment on the six key insights that emerge from this group's performance of feminist standpoint research.

Feminist Standpoint Theory: (1) History and Context

As feminists debate issues of epistemology, identity, politics, and postmodernism in feminist standpoint theory, these debates go well beyond the immediate concerns of feminist standpoint theory and, ultimately, are addressing a much broader concern in feminism: whether or not women can and should be viewed as a group, as sharing a common experience of oppression.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Where Standpoint Stands Now: An Introduction and Commentary
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?