Monks and Multinationals-Business Models of the Middle Ages: The Benedictines and the Cistercians Were Much More Than Religious Orders-They Were Powerful Multinational Organisations from Which the Modern Manager Can Learn

By Witzel, Morgen | European Business Forum, Summer 2004 | Go to article overview

Monks and Multinationals-Business Models of the Middle Ages: The Benedictines and the Cistercians Were Much More Than Religious Orders-They Were Powerful Multinational Organisations from Which the Modern Manager Can Learn


Witzel, Morgen, European Business Forum


We are used to thinking of 'big business' as something that only flourishes in a capitalist, free-market economy. But business has a habit of adapting to whatever environment it finds itself in. In the Middle Ages, European business took on some surprising forms. Small firms might form networks, often over wide geographical distances to create larger business organisations. Sometimes these were limited-life consortia, set up to exploit a particular commercial opportunity and then disbanded when no longer needed. Alternatively, firms might club together in guilds to collectively market their goods and services.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Business also has the habit of adopting other organisational forms, and many of these guilds and other organisations borrowed heavily from the dominant social organisation of the day, the Catholic Church. But the Church itself also had huge commercial interests; according to some estimates, by 1400 the various institutions of the Church controlled between them about one-third of the wealth of Europe. The most powerful and wealthy of these organisations were the large monastic orders, the Benedictines and the Cistercians, and it comes as no surprise to learn that both orders were also powerful multinational businesses.

Order and structure: the Benedictines

The Benedictine monastic order was founded by St Benedict of Nursia around 525 AD, at Monte Cassino in southern Italy. Benedict's initial purpose was to give structure and form to the monastic movement, which at the time was still fairly anarchic (at a previous monastery, Benedict had nearly been poisoned by monks who refused to recognise his authority as abbot). His first step was to draw up what is now known as the Rule of St Benedict, 73 precepts which set out the duties of members of monastic communities. The Rule begins with a statement of goals: monks are to dedicate their work to the glory of God. The remainder of the Rule then specifies how those goals should be carried out, setting not only times of work, meals, prayer and rest but also the hierarchy and chain of command within each monastery. Supreme over all was the abbot, who directed the affairs of each monastery; below him were subordinate officers such as the treasurer, and then came the general chapter of monks. The monks were to obey the orders of the abbot, but those orders had to be explained in chapter, and monks could voice their own views of the abbot's decisions.

Other monasteries quickly recognised the utility of the Rule and adopted it. By 600 AD there were hundreds of monasteries across Europe, all following the Rule and now formally organised into a single organisation. Hundreds more were founded in succeeding centuries. Each monastery had its own lands and its own industries, which were added to by donations from pious lay people over time.

Thus a single monastery with 30 or 40 monks might end up owning thousands or even tens of thousands of acres, including not only farmland but also mines, mills, vineyards, villages and towns, manufacturing industries such as textiles, and seaports. All of these had to be managed and run, and clearly the 30 or 40 monks could not perform the labour themselves. So, the monks became managers, looking after their resources, keeping accounts, managing production and distribution, finding markets and conducting trade as well as their religious duties.

The organisational principles set out in the Rule of St Benedict proved to work equally well in a business context. The abbot in effect became the general manager, with each abbey established as a separate business unit and the other monks each given individual duties and responsibilities within the unit. Each abbot reported in turn to the superior of the order. This was a highly structured, 'top-down' form of organisation, very much oriented towards command and control, and business historians have likened it to the 'line and staff' model of organisation which was popular in the early 20th Century (and still is in some places). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Monks and Multinationals-Business Models of the Middle Ages: The Benedictines and the Cistercians Were Much More Than Religious Orders-They Were Powerful Multinational Organisations from Which the Modern Manager Can Learn
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.