I Still Do Not Believe Gays Should Wed; Richmond Is the New Gretna Green for Same-Sex Couples like the One Celebrated in a Recent TV Drama. but a Controversial Voice Says Such Political Correctness Is a Step Too Far

The Evening Standard (London, England), August 10, 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

I Still Do Not Believe Gays Should Wed; Richmond Is the New Gretna Green for Same-Sex Couples like the One Celebrated in a Recent TV Drama. but a Controversial Voice Says Such Political Correctness Is a Step Too Far


Byline: BRIAN SEWELL

LONG before we could see it for ourselves, television critics were saying that When I'm Sixty-Four would be "the one to watch". On the day that it was broadcast, reviewers praised it for tackling one of the last inviolate taboos - the thought of senior citizens engaged in sex. And commendations the day after were benign - excellent performances, they said, wonderful contrasts of inertia and tension, "television still has the power to discomfit the most raddled viewer".

Raddled as I am, I was indeed discomfited, not by pathos, anguish, melancholy, longing, despair and empathy, but first by utter disbelief in the events, and then by the Peg's Paper happy ending to this tale of two old codgers in each other's arms, starting life anew.

When Ray, inveterate heterosexual, met Jim, dormant poofter with no sexual experience more profound than drifting into a rare wet dream, they fell in love and lived happily ever after. Had they been Rita and Jim or Ray and Jemima, this plot might have been credible, but the sight of two old male wrinklies unbuttoning, fondling, snogging and ( offscreen, thank the Lord), in spite of their mutual inexperience, falling into bed, seemed lamentably improbable.

Even if the event were nourished by faded recollections of pubertal experience with other boys, how could they carry it off without pubertal curiosity and the wild activity of hormones? What for these adult males of, presumably, some aesthetic awareness of the occasional beauty of the human body, had been the triggers of sexual attraction and desire?

I tried switching into lesbian mode and imagined the same plot with the desperate Esther Rantzen taking to Joanna Lumley's bed and was deafened by the sound of frottage as their wrinkles rubbed together.

When I'm Sixty-Four left me unequivocally incredulous. I do not believe that the lifetime heterosexual can contentedly switch to homosexuality. I do not believe that the lifetime chastity of the unlibidinous homosexual could comfortably be abandoned to give sudden expression to that sexuality with a man of his own age, without revulsion at the sags and wrinkles of the stranger's ancient skin. In an affectionate and understanding relationship without sex at 64 I can easily believe, but in a passionate, physical and all discretion to the winds affair, I cannot.

It is perfectly proper for the media to explore these matters, but surely with some firmer grasp of reality than the soppy romance of When I'm Sixty-Four. We have two current threads of male homosexuality in The Bill, one demonstrating the adolescent predicament, the other the resilience of a young constable whose life in this respect is further complicated by his being black.

We have lesbians unformed in Holby City and by the dozen in Bad Girls. I vaguely recall homosexual toes in the waters of EastEnders and other interterminable soaps and, as at least one of us in every 20 is a faggot, this is as it should be in terms of representing minorities on television.

But somehow I feel that I am being hectored, coerced and preached to by the politically correct.

NOW Richmond has announced itself to be London's Gretna Green for same-sex couples.

"Come hither," says the Registrar, "and be registered as civil partners," and a fat lot of good it will do them until the law is changed.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

I Still Do Not Believe Gays Should Wed; Richmond Is the New Gretna Green for Same-Sex Couples like the One Celebrated in a Recent TV Drama. but a Controversial Voice Says Such Political Correctness Is a Step Too Far
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?