Michael Oakeshott: Rationalism and Self-Serving in Politics

By Harvey, A. D. | Contemporary Review, August 2004 | Go to article overview

Michael Oakeshott: Rationalism and Self-Serving in Politics


Harvey, A. D., Contemporary Review


MICHAEL Oakeshott's essay 'Rationalism in Politics', first published in The Cambridge Journal in 1947 and reprinted in Oakeshott's 1962 volume Rationalism in Politics: and Other Essays, is generally recognized to be the most important single text by a philosopher who has come to be acknowledged as the leading British conservative thinker of the post-1945 era. It provides not only a devastating critique of the mind-set of left-leaning would-be social engineers but also an analytic tool, or at least a formula, for distinguishing between a conservative approach to public institutions, respecting the logic of their organic development, and the iconoclasticism of political progressives who suppose that in each generation there exist people (usually themselves) with the intellectual qualifications to dismantle public institutions and rebuild them in a more efficient form. Oakeshott's arguments have proved so serviceable in polemic that little attention seems to have been given to the possibility that he shared in the solipsistic errors which he denounced.

Oakeshott described the political rationalist as recognizing no authority but his own reason, as an enemy 'of prejudice, of the merely traditional, customary or habitual' (p. 1 of Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays); he tends to plump for the 'large outlines' (p. 2); 'much of his political activity consists in bringing the social, political, legal and institutional inheritance of his society before the tribunal of his intellect' (p. 4); 'the most stupendous of our political rationalism'--though by no means the only one--is of course Marxism (p. 26). He dates the emergence of political rationalism from the first half of the seventeenth century, from the writings of Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes: 'Bacon's ambition was to equip the intellect with what appeared to him necessary if certain and demonstrable knowledge of the world in which we live is to be attained ... What is lacking is a clear perception of the nature of certainty and an adequate means of achieving it. "There remains", says Bacon, "but one course for the recovery of a sound and healthy condition--namely, that the entire work of understanding be commenced afresh, and the mind itself be from the outset not left to take its own course, but guided at every step"' (p. 14).

The key element in rationalism according to Oakeshott is a privileging of what he calls 'technical knowledge' at the expense of what he somewhat inaptly characterizes as 'practical knowledge':

   In every art and science, and in every practical activity, a
   technique is involved. In many activities this technical knowledge is
   formulated into rules which are, or may be, deliberately learned,
   remembered, and, as we say, put into practice; but whether or not it
   is, or has been precisely formulated, its chief characteristic is
   that it is susceptible of precise formulation .... The second sort of
   knowledge I will call practical, because it exists only in use, is
   not reflective and (unlike technique) cannot be formulated in rules
   .... In a practical art, such as cookery, nobody supposes that the
   knowledge that belongs to a good cook is confined to what is or may
   be written down in the cookery book ... the same is true of the fine
   arts, of painting, of music, of poetry; a high degree of technique
   knowledge, even where it is both subtle and ready, is one thing; the
   ability to create a work of art, the ability to compose something
   with real musical qualities, the ability to write a great sonnet, is
   another, and requires, in addition to technique, this other sort of
   knowledge (pp. 14-15).

Where Oakeshott begins to be unconvincing is in his discussion of why people should be so wholehearted in mistaking merely technical knowledge for the whole of knowledge. He says that 'The new and politically inexperienced social classes which, during the last four centuries, have risen to the exercise of political initiative and authority .

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Michael Oakeshott: Rationalism and Self-Serving in Politics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.