Terrorism Response and the Environmental Health Role: The Million-Dollar (and Some) Question

By Berg, Rebecca | Journal of Environmental Health, September 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Terrorism Response and the Environmental Health Role: The Million-Dollar (and Some) Question

Berg, Rebecca, Journal of Environmental Health


A couple of years before September 11, a needs assessment was conducted in Union County, North Carolina, to determine what resources various agencies needed for disaster preparedness. On that occasion, all the funding that was available ended up going to hazmat teams, to fire departments, to police departments. There was no money left for public health, according to Tom Ward, environmental health director.


"They're buying fire trucks and $50,000 detection equipment and bomb robots," added Tom Butts, emergency management coordinator with the Tri-County Health Department in Thornton, Colorado, "and we're asking for a pickup truck so that we can tow a trailer .... Our stuff just doesn't look as sexy as their stuff."

September 11 and the subsequent anthrax attacks did to some extent raise the profile of public health. Lawmakers began to express concern about a decaying public health infrastructure. In 2002, Congress passed the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Response Act, which provided money through CDC for counterterrorism planning.

But today, three years after September 11, public discourse is still dominated by images that, while they are not untrue, tell only part of the story of terrorism preparedness and response--romantic-heroic images of rescues by police and firefighters, of squads in Level A suits entering toxic zones. One sees the effect of this preoccupation in funding and budget decisions, and in the target audiences of training programs offered by federal agencies. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), for instance, offer a myriad of valuable training opportunities for firefighters, law enforcement, and hazmat personnel. Web, satellite, and on-site courses are all available, as is funding that helps local agencies send its employees to participate. While course descriptions occasionally mention public health personnel as a "secondary" target audience, a search through the agencies' Web sites did not turn up any counter-terrorism courses specifically targeted to environmental health.

It is true that with funding from the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Response Act, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been dispensing money for terrorism response through cooperative agreements with the states. Some local environmental health departments have received some money under that arrangement, as will be discussed later in this article. CDC also has helped fund the Louisville Metro Community Based Emergency Response Program, which provides training geared toward public health and emergency response personnel from around the country. CDC also provides a wide variety of satellite and Web courses for clinicians and lab personnel on topics such as smallpox, plague, and anthrax. (For more information on the Louisville program, go to http://health.loukymetro.org/. For links to a variety of general public health-oriented training opportunities, go to http://www.astho.org/templates/display_pub.php?pub_id=614&admin=1.)

But just as the larger public discourse on terrorism has to some extent overlooked the role of public health, public health discussions have often overlooked environmental health.

"We focused right away on the medical side," observed Ron Grimes, director/health officer with the Jackson County Health Department in Michigan, "probably because the first term to come into play was bioterrorism, and we had the anthrax situation shortly after 9/11 .... And so I think that little bit moved us away from what the real issues are." For one thing, terrorists--from the Oklahoma City bombers to the train bombers of Madrid, Spain, to those currently operating in the Middle East--often use readily available traditional explosives to create terrible destruction. Environmental health professionals with whom the Journal of Environmental Health (JEH) spoke also are keenly aware of the potential for chemical and radiological disasters, intentional or not.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Terrorism Response and the Environmental Health Role: The Million-Dollar (and Some) Question


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?