True Multiculturalism: Setting No Boundaries

By Hassenger, Robert | Commonweal, April 10, 1992 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

True Multiculturalism: Setting No Boundaries

Hassenger, Robert, Commonweal

Higher education continues to reap the effects of the social reforms of the sixties and seventies, both encouraging and discouraging. More students, from a wider range of backgrounds, are going to college. With this wider range of students, the call for "cultural diversity" has properly meant a heightened concern for multicultural perspectives in the curriculum. But, not so properly, it has also sometimes come to mean, with the rise of "multiculturalism," a subordination of academic to political concerns. Earlier, campus protesters were primarily students, with some faculty supporters. Their demand--for civil rights or against the Vietnam War--was to extend the basic rights and responsibilities of the democratic heritage, insisting upon a reconciliation of the ideals of Western civilization with the practices of that civilization as they knew it. Now, many of the protesters are on the faculty, and the enemy is not government or business, but the "canon" of Western civilization.

How does the curriculum get involved? At least some of the appeal of the ideology of multiculturalism is that it serves a different kind of "victim's" revolution on campus. Enter those who insist that Western culture is inherently hostile to women, blacks and other minorities, and homosexuals. It is "institutionally" racist, sexist, classist, homophobic, ageist, ableist, speciesist, and looksist. And enter those who offer a new discipline," one that invalidates the knowledge and methods of those in tenured teaching positions, who are unable to deconstruct, revolutionize, or de-phallogocentrize the curriculum.

In the deconstructionists' indeterminancy of meaning lies the future for those who feel "uncomfortable": we seem to have a politics of identify for those who feel excluded, either from "representation" in a curriculum that purportedly reflects only the work of DWEMs (dead, white, European males); or from "representation" on the faculty, because only those who have "experienced" the sexism, racism, etc. of the culture can really teach about it. "True diversity" for many multiculturalists means that gender and ethnicity must match the fields in which the new orthodoxy is taught, because a scholar's race and sex must be correctly brought to bear on the subject.

These new critics aspire not only to deconstruct, but to engage in "restitutive criticism," to restore the voices of those who feel--and feeling sometimes seems a principal criterion-alienated, by drawing upon the guilt of the white liberal. (They do not seem to recognize that even the appeal to liberal guilt is a peculiarly Western phenomenon, and that the very idea of oppression is grounded in Western categories of thought, as the sociologist Andrew Hacker has noted.)

So "multiculturalism" is too often neither "multi" nor "cultural." It stands for a new ideology that discourages--even punishes critical analysis. If one opposes the view that, say, the Western "canon" must be thrown out as "an exercise in colonization," he (this is easier with males, preferably white, but see Stephen Carter's Reflections of an affirmative action Baby) is charged with being racist, sexist, homophobic. Intimidation and epithet have replaced rational argument. Those who play this game are able to immunize themselves from criticism through the revisionist position that all thought is political. To "dialogue" with them is to accept their premises.

An honest intellectual perspective, however, would certainly take into account the social and historical forces that have shaped all expressions of culture--including the au courant. Of course power has determined the received wisdom of any society or cultural tradition. Of course reality is socially constructed, and knowledge is power: what is produced and/or recorded at a given time is in part a function of who had the power, and reflects certain shared ideological biases. But this need not force us into a Foucauldian reductionism that would dismiss the contributions of the Western tradition, or of individual intellect and imagination.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

True Multiculturalism: Setting No Boundaries


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?