An Auditor's Best Friend? Standing Committees on Public Accounts

By Malloy, Jonathan | Canadian Public Administration, Summer 2004 | Go to article overview

An Auditor's Best Friend? Standing Committees on Public Accounts


Malloy, Jonathan, Canadian Public Administration


This article examines public accounts committees (PACs) in Canadian legislatures and their relationship with legislative auditors. It looks at PACs in their context as instruments of the legislature and how this political and legislative context affects their relationship with legislative auditors. As such, I am less concerned with legislative auditors themselves than with the important but varying relationship between auditors and legislative assemblies. Even so, the role of PACs can be crucial to the effective functioning of legislative auditors. This study argues that the best committees are able to complement and enhance the role of legislative auditors, primarily by providing an important public forum for the further exploration of issues identified by auditors. In this sense, PACs are an auditor's best friend. Now, not all PACs are equally strong, and there are serious discrepancies in the resources available to them, quite apart from any differences in the operations and mandates of their corresponding auditors. But resources do not tell the whole story either. The chief achievement of public accounts committees is their role as a public forum, rather than their reports and recommendations. As such, it is ultimately the attitudes of members, auditors and governments that determine the role and effectiveness of public accounts committees.

The article proceeds as follows. We begin with an introduction to public accounts committees and their similarities and differences across Canada. We then move to their components and activities, as well as their relationship to legislative auditors. The article then considers the effectiveness of committees and possible difficulties, including partisanship and the issue of public servants' appearances as witnesses, and illustrates these points through a brief case study of the 2002-03 federal Groupaction investigation. The article concludes with a discussion of overall PAC effectiveness and how it might be enhanced across Canada. (1)

An introduction to PACs

Very little research has been conducted on Canadian public accounts committees. This is somewhat surprising, since the function of PACs--accountability--is perhaps the most basic function of Westminster-style parliaments. More than any other type of legislative committee, PACs exist solely for the purpose of holding governments to account. They do not consider bills. They do not conduct policy inquiries. Very rarely do they travel or hear from the general public. Instead, they focus on scrutinizing past government activities and investigating whether governments have made good use of resources and properly accounted for their actions.

A standing committee on public accounts can be found in the House of Commons and in every provincial legislative assembly in Canada except Quebec, which has a standing committee on public administration. Yukon has a standing committee on public accounts, while the Northwest Territories has a standing committee on accountability and oversight and Nunavut has a select standing committee on government operations and services, both of which perform functions similar to provincial PACs.

Like other legislative standing committees, public accounts committees are composed solely of legislators, distributed proportionately to their parties' standings in the assembly. In some ways, PACs have more in common with other committees in their own legislature than with each other, particularly in terms of size, resources and levels of activity. But public accounts committees have several unique properties in common that set them apart from other legislative committees.

Similarities

First and most noticeably, PACs are chaired by a member of the official opposition party. In the House of Commons and all provinces except Quebec, all other standing committees are normally chaired by members of the governing party. (Quebec has both government and opposition committee chairs, while recent Commons reforms have increased the possibility of opposition chairs, if desired by the committee). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Auditor's Best Friend? Standing Committees on Public Accounts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.