Alarm as a Bogus Nanny Fools the Job Agencies

Daily Mail (London), October 7, 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Alarm as a Bogus Nanny Fools the Job Agencies


FRIGHTENING loopholes in the vetting systems used by Britain's nanny agencies have been highlighted by an undercover investigation.

One in four was willing to put an unqualified young woman, whose only experience was occasional babysitting, into homes across the country.

Some agencies said they did not need to carry out the full background checks that would show criminal convictions and flag up someone who was a danger to children.

Meanwhile, other agencies were willing to accept bogus or unsatisfactory references, which provided little or no reliable evidence of childcare experience.

The probe was carried out by Which?

and the consumer watchdog wants Education Secretary Charles Clarke to set up a national register for qualified nannies.

The Government plans to launch a list of approved child carers, including criminal checks, next April but it is not expected to stipulate minimum qualifications or experience and the move is considered inadequate by experts.

Which? editor Malcolm Coles said: 'It's nerve-wracking enough leaving children in a stranger's care, without the added worry that nanny agencies may not be making the checks they claim.

'We want to see a full national nanny registration scheme so parents can make an informed decision about who they employ.' The Which? study comes amid concerns that youngsters are being handed over to unqualified nannies who have little idea about first aid skills and the right food, educational needs and discipline required to care for children.

Experts believe that a nanny should have at least two years' experience working with children, preferably in a nursery.

However, five out of 20 agencies approached by a Which? researcher pretending to be a 22-year-old with no qualifications and limited babysitting experience, said this was not necessary.

Ten agencies were picked at random and ten members of the Recruitment and Employment Confederation - a professional body for nanny agencies - were also contacted. One, in the north of England, offered the researcher a live-in post, in charge of a family's young children for much of the day, without even meeting her.

The same agency claimed that all its nannies were qualified, experienced and professional people. A London agency agreed to set up a meeting with parents looking for a nanny based on just a phone call.

The agency, which charges parents [pounds sterling]999 a time, states on its website that all staff have two years' childcare experience.

An REC member in the North West was also happy to hire the bogus nanny. A consultant told her: 'You don't have to be qualified, any experience is good.' Agencies in Yorkshire and Wales were also willing to place the researcher in live-in, fulltime jobs.

Most parents turn to agencies because they are authorised to carry out Criminal Records Bureau checks, which show convictions, cautions, reprimands or warnings by the police. They can also check government lists of people banned from working with children.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Alarm as a Bogus Nanny Fools the Job Agencies


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?