Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Brilliance Remembered

By: Chen, Jim | Constitutional Commentary, Winter 2003 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Brilliance Remembered


Chen, Jim, Constitutional Commentary


Twenty years ago Daniel Farber cofounded Constitutional Commentary. (1) Dan's essay on McCulloch v. Maryland, (2) "Banking on National Power," concludes the twentieth volume of this journal. (3) Among his many achievements in twenty-two years on the faculty of the University of Minnesota Law School, Dan helped secure Constitutional Commentary's place as one of America's preeminent law journals. As of 2004, Dan will be teaching full-time at the University of California at Berkeley. Once again, glitzy California has snagged one of gritty Minnesota's best. (4) Though we hope that Dan will continue writing for Constitutional Commentary, "Banking on National Power" represents the last time he will appear in these pages as a member of the Minnesota law faculty and as an editor of this journal. As much as we wish we could travel back in time, change history, and thereby prevent Dan's departure, (5) we must accept the truth. Adios amigo, y viva Las Vegas: Elvis has left the building.

It is altogther fitting and proper that Dan's farewell to Constitutional Commentary and to Minnesota should address the enduring legacy of a decision that is arguably the most important case in American law. At least one empirical study of citation counts ranks McCulloch the most influential Supreme Court decision of all time. (6) McCulloch's relative importance is fiercely contested, of course. Some observers consider Brown v. Board of Education (7) "the most important decision in the history of the Court." (8) The iconic Marbury v. Madison (9) has its fans, (10) too, but Dan casts his favor elsewhere. By his own admission, Dan has reached the "unromantic" conclusion that …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?