The Bioethics of Business: Rethinking the Relationship between Bioethics Consultants and Corporate Clients

By De Vries, Raymond G.; Bosk, Charles L. | The Hastings Center Report, September-October 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Bioethics of Business: Rethinking the Relationship between Bioethics Consultants and Corporate Clients

De Vries, Raymond G., Bosk, Charles L., The Hastings Center Report

What in the hell's happened to you George? I said when I saw him. His right arm was bandaged to the shoulder, the crook of his left arm looked like overdone bacon, his lips were blistered, his nose was shiny with grease and swollen out of shape and his right ear was red and thickened.

They want me to go back to work, he said. They told me if I didn't go back I wouldn't get paid. I want to see you. (1)

George--the central character in William Carlos Williams' story "The Paid Nurse"--is speaking with his doctor. Earlier in the day he had been cleaning metal disks by rinsing them in a pail of flammable solvent and placing them in a two hundred degree oven. He knew this was dangerous work, but his boss insisted. George describes the events that followed: "I hadn't hardly started when, blup! it happened ... I smelt burnt hair and cloth and saw my gloves blazing." His co-workers put out the flames and took him to the nurse. "She called the [company] doctor but he didn't come any nearer than six feet from me. That's not very bad, he said." The nurse agreed with the doctor, put tannic acid on George's fight arm, and demanded he go back to work. "And by the way, she said, don't go to any other doctor." (2)

Williams' account of George's mistreatment at the hands of caregivers on the company payroll is instructive for those watching how the pharmaceutical industry is working with bioethicists. Williams does not suggest that the nurse and doctor were greedy people, anxious to render diagnoses favorable to the company in exchange for money. In fact, Williams tells us nothing about the character of the caregivers; instead, he focuses our attention on the way financial incentives color medical judgment and constrain behavior.

"The Paid Nurse" shows us how the financial arrangements of caregiving shape the care given. Is the advice bioethicists give to the drug and medical device industries also shaped by the way bioethicists are paid? Clearly, bioethicists are not naive about the way money, can influence scholarly work and medical advice--witness the large bioethical literature on conflicts of interest and the efforts of bioethicists to structure their consulting relationships to minimize the role of money in shaping their recommendations. Examples of the latter include: the use of disclosure, complex schemes for funding ethics advisory boards, and the designation of the money for project support as an "unrestricted gift" rather than as funding for work with an agreed-upon deliverable. Unfortunately, none of these arrangements solves the conflict of interest problem. Lacking consensus on what must be disclosed, disclosure can be nothing more than an empty ritual. Innovative funding schemes, such as irrevocable trusts that prevent a company from disbursing the funding depending on how much k likes the bioethicists' advice, are a step in the right direction, (3) but they must be very carefully crafted to efface the potential tensions of serving two masters--of being ethical advisor to the corporation and advocate for the experimental subject. And to a sociologist, the designation of project funding as a "gift" creates problems of obligation that can be more severe than those written into contracts. (4)

Because of the private nature of bioethics consultation, we know very little about how ethicists are selected, what advice is given, what issues are fired, what rationales are raised and discarded, or how interests are balanced. In a few instances, however, bioethicists have offered descriptions of their consulting work in peer-reviewed publications and on the web. Two such cases are particularly interesting. Both involve ethicists supported by funding from the drug company Eli Lilly; the fist involves the ethics of research, the second focuses on ethical problems in clinical practice.

In the late 1990s, Eli Lilly faced an ethical problem. The public learned about Lilly's problem via an article in the Wall Street Journal that article described the company's use of homeless alcoholics for Phase I trials of new drugs--trials designed to test a new drug's toxicity.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Bioethics of Business: Rethinking the Relationship between Bioethics Consultants and Corporate Clients


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?