The New Role and Politics of State Regulation: Is the Recent Trend of Expanding State Regulation Beneficial or Harmful?

By Teske, Paul | Regulation, Fall 2004 | Go to article overview

The New Role and Politics of State Regulation: Is the Recent Trend of Expanding State Regulation Beneficial or Harmful?


Teske, Paul, Regulation


FOUR FRIENDS ARE HAVING A DRINK after a think tank's annual meeting. Two are ideologically conservative scholars--she is a fan of as much deregulation as possible, he is an ardent states' rights advocate. The other two are businesspeople--she operates mainly in one state, he operates a nationwide, and increasingly international, firm. The topic of American state regulation comes up.

The deregulation scholar expresses disappointment with state regulators, arguing that, from trucking to insurance to telecommunications, they have not wanted to reduce their role. She wants more federal preemption of state regulation. Her scholarly colleague argues for more devolution--give the states time and they will be forced, via economic development competition, to find efficient policies, which include more deregulation. In any case, he adds, that is the appropriate level at which to address issues of intrastate commerce. The business leaders join in--she is happily dominating her state legislature and getting protective regulation. He is frustrated by varying regulatory policies across the states and by emerging activist attorneys general and other state policymakers,

Who is right? What do we really know about the politics and economics of state regulation, and the extent to which it supplements, substitutes, or otherwise interacts with federal regulation?

STATE REGULATION

State regulation has been around a long time, predating federal regulation (indeed, predating the federal government). Insurance and corporate charters were the first forms. In 1752, Pennsylvania granted a charter to Ben Franklin's Philadelphia Contributorship for the Insurance of Houses from Loss by Fire. Pennsylvania chartered the first stock insurance company in 1794. Even though the Civil War marked a major shift toward a greater federal role in the economy relative to the states, the states helped develop ideas about how to regulate the railroad industry, which provided the critical infrastructure for the development of national commerce. The 1890 Sherman Act is generally cited as the start of antitrust regulation, but 20 states had passed antitrust legislation before 1890. In the 20th century, states developed trucking regulation before the federal government. Prior to the Great Depression, most financial regulation took place at the state level. Texas initially won innovation awards for its 1962 decision to relax regulations on the investment choices of its savings and loans, an idea the federal government later adopted. California legislation on automobile emissions pushed forward national environmental regulations. Florida deregulated economic regulation of its intrastate trucking industry in 1980, the same year in which the federal government deregulated interstate trucking--both to great successes.

Thus, perhaps under many analysts' radar, state regulation is not a harmless anachronism from the 19th century. As much as 20 percent of the American economy is regulated by the states, including elements of such critical industries as telecommunications, energy, insurance, and professions. Despite predictions to the contrary, it does not seem likely to fade away, either from state-vs.-state economic development competition or in the face of growing international trade.

Consider five 21st century state actions. In the area of monopoly and competition, determined state attorneys general from nine states resisted a proposed U.S. Department of Justice settlement of the Microsoft antitrust case. In occupational regulation, New Mexico became the first state to allow psychologists to prescribe medication, formerly permitted only to M.D. psychiatrists. Addressing asymmetric information problems in the wake of many Internet finn collapses and corporate accounting scandals, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer successfully sued Merrill Lynch, prompting much wider investigation of financial firms. Also dealing with information, seven state legislatures passed "do not call" laws against telemarketers, the popularity of which prompted the Bush administration's Federal Trade Commission chair Timothy Muris to develop a national rule limiting telemarketing that he admitted would not have been developed otherwise. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The New Role and Politics of State Regulation: Is the Recent Trend of Expanding State Regulation Beneficial or Harmful?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.