1492

By Amin, Samir | Monthly Review, July-August 1992 | Go to article overview

1492


Amin, Samir, Monthly Review


If I were required to pick a date to mark the birth of the modern world, I should choose 1492, the year in which the Europeans began their conquest of the planet--military, economic, political, ideological, cultural, and even, in a certain sense, ethnic. But the world in question is also the world of capitalism, a new social and economic system, qualitatively different from all previous systems in Europe and elsewhere. These two traits are inseparable, and this fact calls into question all analyses of and responses to the crisis of modernity that fail to recognize their simultaniety. From this perspective, the dominant "social science" can be seen to be handicapped by its Eurocentrism, which in my opinion prevents it from correctly relating these two aspects of the modern world and its contradictions.

1. The modernity that began in 1492 put an end to 2000 years of prior history for the majority of humanity. Until then the great regions of civilization had remained quite alike, marked by fundamental traits which I have called "tributary," by analogy to their modes of production.

This mode of production arose in the fifth century B.C., when Zoroaster in Iran, Buddha in India, and Confucius in China almost simultaneously formulated ideologies adequate for the tributary system in question. It was a matter, as I have tried to show elsewhere, of a metaphysics that could legitimate power and inequality in states that exceeded the scale of the village and tribal communities of earlier times, and with that end to reconcile supernatural belief and rationality. In the region in which Europe was to arise, this tributary ideology took the forms of Hellenism and then Christianity, while on its mideastern flank it took the form of Islam.

But if the majority of humanity inhabiting Eurasia and Africa partook of a common form of civilization during the 2000 years before 1492, it was fragmented into relatively autonomous cultural worlds. The forces of production of the tributary mode, while superior to those of earlier epochs, were vastly inferior to those of industrial capitalism and therefore imposed a limit on exchange among the various regions of the world. Such exchange existed and had a certain importance, but I believe it was more significant on the level of transfer of knowledge, technology, and ideas than on the economic level in the narrow sense. There was no world division of labor in essential products as there is in the world of today. The tributary mode was defined by the dominance of its ideology and politics, which served to legitimize social reproduction; the regions that made up the ancient world effectively understood themselves in relationship to its main cultural currents: Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam, Christianity.

The event of 1492 put into motion the erosion of this cultural diversity, whose import would be considerably reduced by the progressive subjection of all regions of the planet to the expansion of capitalism through European conquest.

2. If the crossing of the Atlantic would always be regarded as a singular and accidental event, the transformations of the world that came after 1492 could not. What followed the discovery of the New World was, in effect, the acceleration of the construction of capitalism, and the conquest of the globe which began with the Americas was entirely subject to its logic. In the face of a variety of problems of interpretation, various social thinkers have adopted one or another of three positions:

(i) One group attributes the novelties that arose in European society (the philosophy of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, the extension of trade relations, the bourgeois revolutions and democracy, etc. ) to antecedents specific and peculiar to Europe, minimizing the conquests of America and the rest of the world, considering them to be at most contributors to the acceleration of the irresistible ascension of Europe.

(ii) A second attributes to the luck of the discovery and conquest of America, and to several other fortuitous events of the same nature, a decisive role in the construction of the modern capitalist world, unified by European conquest. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

1492
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.