Peace, Ethics, and the Failure of Jewish Liberalism

By Mirvish, Adrian | Judaism: A Quarterly Journal of Jewish Life and Thought, Spring 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Peace, Ethics, and the Failure of Jewish Liberalism


Mirvish, Adrian, Judaism: A Quarterly Journal of Jewish Life and Thought


SOME TIME AGO MY FAMILY AND I ATTENDED A RALLY for Israel in downtown San Francisco. The crowd was large and speeches from lay and religious Jewish officials were interspersed with songs. Although some of the music was uplifting I felt a distinct sense of disquietude with the words of one tune that called in universalistic tones for peace between Israel and its neighbors, emphasizing the words "shalom" and "salaam." I clearly was not alone in my reticence for while some of the crowd sang with fervor, others deliberately refrained. I feel a similar reticence welling up inside me when it comes to prayers for peace every Shabbat. In the face of suicide bombings, or even attempts at such, is there not cognitive dissonance in even talking, much less asking, for peace?

In spite of such reservations, there are still many Jews who advocate peace as a truly viable possibility, unswerving in their insistence that this state of affairs can--or indeed, must absolutely--be attained, even in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds. In this light, I can think of the recent talks of two rabbis of liberal persuasion who, while insisting that we need always to consider both sides regarding the war to eliminate Saddam Hussein, never mentioned the fact that over a 30-month period alone Iraq had contributed $34 million to pay the families of suicide bombers. Or consider the case of a Jewish family who went to march in a San Francisco anti-war demonstration despite the fact that it was organized, in this case, by a rabidly anti-Israel group known to be opposed to the very existence of the Jewish state.

One could continue with more examples in the same vein, but the above I think suffices to identify the type of liberal sentiment that I wish to discuss. I am not concerned here with those who question Israel's right to exist. My interest lies instead with the moral and political convictions of Jews who support the existence of the Jewish State. The concern is with people who not only identify with, but play some active role in, the Jewish community, people whose commitment to a liberal view moves them to respond with wistful talk of peace at a time when, vis-a-vis the intifada, Israel is in effect at war. What about this liberal world view allows them to insist on the immediate need for peace even although Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and Hammas are dedicated, overtly, to destroying the Jewish State? What is it about this liberal world view that promoted virulent opposition, or at least extreme reticence, to a war aimed at ousting Saddam Hussein, a dictator not only known for vicious crimes against his own people but one who was also unambiguous in his desire to eliminate Israel? How is this liberal world view related to Jewish tradition, and what alternatives are there within the tradition for those, like myself, who have long endorsed a liberal standpoint but now think that September 11th and the Palestinian war against Israel call for some profound adjustments to this liberal agenda? Is it possible to reconcile a yearning for rational, peaceful solutions to this complex human conflict and the realities of contemporary terrorist movements?

The contemporary, liberal Jewish response to this moral dilemma is clearly inadequate. Although Jewish liberalism has in the past been so important in a number of areas--as, for instance, in its commitment to the American Civil Rights movement of the sixties--this same set of ideas has by now unfortunately become fossilized. Rather than dealing with an important, humanistic force, what is left today is essentially an ideology that judges reality through a set of a priori constraints instead of engaging the situation on its own, sometimes unpleasant, grounds. This lamentable ossification, I wish to show, is the result of liberal Jewish sentiment having been cut off from the very tradition that inspired it.

Consider the moral and political stance of A. J. Heschel, specifically his God in Search of Man (1) and Who is Man.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Peace, Ethics, and the Failure of Jewish Liberalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?