Reflections on Taste

By Grassi, Marco | New Criterion, December 2004 | Go to article overview

Reflections on Taste


Grassi, Marco, New Criterion


Not long ago, I enjoyed a spirited conversation with a highly perceptive and well-informed observer of our contemporary cultural landscape--a conversation mostly concerned with the quality of art criticism as practiced today in the principal forums of informed opinion: university lecture halls and scholarly journals. My friend and I readily agreed that the cultural terrain we surveyed was disappointing, to say the least: a barren and monochrome landscape, We thus echoed a familiar lament, repeated often over the years, he, in far more articulate terms than I.

As I later reconsidered some of the points we discussed, it occurred to me that a contributing factor to the ills that we were so strenuously deploring was the absence, in contemporary criticism, of one important ingredient. Simply put, it seemed that the role of taste--yes, taste--had so dramatically diminished in the dialogue on art that it had virtually disappeared. Taste no longer an ingredient of art criticism? ... Impossible. Surely my memory was again playing tricks on me. How could taste not be accounted for in any serious discourse dealing with artistic expression? And yet, try as I might, only irrelevant recent references came to mind: the oddly titled exhibition A Taste of Angels, Gerald Reitlinger's rather too venal Economics of Taste, and the impossibly snobbish display of Princely Taste. No doubt about it; taste was no longer common currency in today's cultural bazaar. Undeterred, I continued my search.

It was like trying to locate an old and trusted friend and suddenly realizing he had dropped from sight: no address, no telephone listing, not even a mention in the school alumni register. Since I had always regarded taste as an indispensable companion in my encounters with art, this disappearance represented a substantial loss. Relying on taste as a companion made these encounters--superficial as they may have been--certainly more enjoyable and, to some extent, a great deal easier. Did something on a gallery wall not agree with me? ... I could blame my trusty guide--taste--or a momentary desertion thereof. Just like a powerful serum, taste provided immunity against the unwelcome onslaughts of the ever more aggressive viruses circulating in the contemporary art world. Taste was also a vanity that allowed me to feel superior, yet, at the same time, provided a shield behind which to hide my considerable ignorance. Its absence, now, posed a real problem for anyone like me, whose early art-awareness had been nurtured in the mid-twentieth century by a combination of family tradition and academic training.

How, then, can taste be defined in this context? In its simplest terms, I would compare it to an indicating arrow. The magnetic fields to which this arrow responds are constituted by accretions of heredity, experience, tutoring and, occasionally, enlightened awareness. Taste, therefore, possesses no true-north, as in a compass, but it most emphatically does have direction--better yet, directions. And these directions are the vectors of our aesthetic inclinations; they condition our preferences and responses. Without this essential GPS, significant dialogue in matters of art cannot continue. Or so I thought. Yet there was no denying that, yes indeed, taste was no longer an issue. Definitely gone. Perhaps forgotten? Replaced? No, much worse ... irreparably unfashionable ... its passing unmourned.

The reasons for this demise are not difficult to enumerate. Principal among them are the connotations associated with the word itself. Taste, after all, implies that the preferences and responses prompted by one person's aesthetic inclinations may well be different from another's. The directional arrows of which I spoke may, indeed, legitimately point to opposite poles, and yet these poles may be perfectly equidistant and equivalent. That's fine; different tastes, same values. But, then again, they might not. If so, could not one direction be truer than another?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reflections on Taste
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.