Cool, Calm and Collected; New York's Museum of Modern Art Is Back in Business: Svelte and Shiny, Writes Jonathan Glancey, Compared with Our Brooding, Industrial Tate

By Glancey, Jonathan | New Statesman (1996), November 29, 2004 | Go to article overview

Cool, Calm and Collected; New York's Museum of Modern Art Is Back in Business: Svelte and Shiny, Writes Jonathan Glancey, Compared with Our Brooding, Industrial Tate


Glancey, Jonathan, New Statesman (1996)


I'm just not sure. Will the gleaming new Museum of Modern Art in the heart of Manhattan continue to look and feel as messianically clean and glossy as it did in the days leading up to its turbo-hyped opening? I think of Tate Modern back across the Atlantic and up along the Thames. On a good day, for the Tate, the former power station is often packed to the gunwales with visitors. It has the feel of some grandly cinematic airport departure lounge crossed with a brutalist concrete shopping mall the week before Christmas, with a dark dash of Piranesi's 18th-century prison engravings added to the battering mix. I am sure this is great: culture for all. Pile it high, pack'em in. Everyone loves a winner.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The new-look MoMA is, from an architectural point of view, the polar opposite of Tate Modern. Where the titanic Tate is, at core, a dark and brooding industrial brick, steel and concrete colossus, MoMA is supercool and shiny, like some svelte downtown office block, rich with the art hanging from its sheer white walls, dangling from soaring atriums and lining minimalist lobby after minimalist lobby. Similar to a supremely self-confident corporate headquarters, it seems the stuff of hushed corridors, sleek executives, silent escalators and purposeful, lucrative activity. All that green slate from Vermont and black Zimbabwean granite, those forests of oak floors, the mesmerising vistas of stairs crossing stairs oh so high in what becomes, as the eye loses focus, almost pure architectural ether.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

In truth, MoMA will be as packed with visitors as Tate Modern, perhaps even more so, each paying $20 for the privilege. This is, in every way, an expensive and yet discreetly ambitious piece of architecture. Twice as big as Tate Modern and occupying a large chunk of the city block between West 53rd and 54th Streets, it is effectively a brand-new building. Involving extensive gutting and demolition, the overhaul has cost more than $800m.

The architect is Yoshio Taniguchi (born in 1937), a discreet, Tokyo-based perfectionist who has worked with painstaking and diplomatic care to translate meticulous Japanese attention to architectural detail to an altogether rougher and readier New York construction site. When Taniguchi's winning design for the museum was announced in 1997, some commentators called for a more dramatic building, something along the lines of, say, Frank Gehry's bombastic Bilbao Guggenheim. After all, it was at MoMA in 1932, three years after it was founded by Alfred H Barr, that the architect Philip Johnson and historian Henry-Russell Hitchcock mounted a show of international modern architecture that truly revolutionised building design in the US. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Cool, Calm and Collected; New York's Museum of Modern Art Is Back in Business: Svelte and Shiny, Writes Jonathan Glancey, Compared with Our Brooding, Industrial Tate
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.