Logging Van Diemen's Land: Is There a Green Light for More Sustainable Forestry in Tasmania?

By McGhee, Karen | Ecos, November-December 2004 | Go to article overview

Logging Van Diemen's Land: Is There a Green Light for More Sustainable Forestry in Tasmania?


McGhee, Karen, Ecos


Although the origins of the Tasmanian forestry debate extend back decades, there's recently been a growing sense of ecological urgency from the green side that there could soon be nothing left to fight for; that continued logging of the state's native forests is causing an irreversible loss of international significance.

'Certainly in the wider scientific and environmental communities, it's recognised that we've really just about run out of time,' comments Dr Tony Norton, Professor of Spatial Information Science and Head of Geospatial Science at Melbourne's RMIT University.

Norton was one of the key protagonists behind a public declaration calling for an end to old-growth logging in Tasmania which was placed as an advertisement in the Australian newspaper, other publications and on websites just before the 2004 Federal election. About 100 leading Australian scientists across a wide range of disciplines endorsed the statement.

'There are now more and more impacts on those high conservation value forests that were recognised some time ago but weren't protected,' Norton explains, referring to areas many scientists believe should have been reserved from logging according to the scientific rationale underpinning the Tasmanian Regional Forestry Agreement (RFA), but haven't.

'Certainly in my judgement and in my colleagues; if we were to wait one more election cycle another three years--we're going to lose a lot of these areas and all of their biodiversity, landscape, wilderness and heritage values, not to mention the potential tourism, leisure and recreational amenity values they would have as well,' Norton says.

'We wanted to make it known very strongly, particularly to the Commonwealth Government, that if we didn't act now there would be no other significant opportunity to safeguard these remaining forests.'

On the so-called brown side of the debate, there's also a feeling that crunch time for the controversy is approaching. There is now a raft of action groups and traditional environmental organisations dedicated to ending Tasmania's old-growth logging practices and there has also been a flurry of policy documents addressing the issue from industry bodies, political parties, government departments, environmental groups and even the Uniting Church.

Having been reproached in the British Parliament and with polls showing most Australians want an end to old-growth logging, Tasmania's forestry industry has been under siege. Many working in forestry with good intentions are understandably tired of criticism and of being perceived as uneducated and uncaring by the wider community.

All serious strategies proffering solutions to the impasse anticipate job losses, some substantial, from regional locations throughout Tasmania. Many on the green side advocate retraining in, and a shift towards, tourism operations, possibly an option for young workers, but widely considered unrealistic for older employees. According to many social indicators, Tasmania is the most impoverished state and loggers are understandably prepared to fight for their jobs.

The green side, however, has managed some significant, although small, victories. The state government, for example, recently gave a commitment to an imminent phasing out of the practice of baiting native wildlife with 1080, the poison used to kill animals that eat plantation seedlings, but also implicated in wider ecological impacts.

Beside poisoning and old-growth logging, there are several other strong criticisms about the way forestry operates in Tasmania. Many are uncomfortable, for example, that the industry is dominated by one economically and politically powerful commercial player, Gunns Ltd, the nation's largest timber company. Despite the debate raging around it, Gunns has just recorded a 42% increase in after-tax profits.

With forestry operations in Tasmania exempt from Freedom of Information legislation (now mooted to change) and development laws applying to other industries, many locals complain the industry's operations are covert. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Logging Van Diemen's Land: Is There a Green Light for More Sustainable Forestry in Tasmania?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.