House Republicans Ditch Ethics Plans; Refuse to 'Give Democrats an Issue'

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), January 4, 2005 | Go to article overview

House Republicans Ditch Ethics Plans; Refuse to 'Give Democrats an Issue'


Byline: Amy Fagan, THE WASHINGTON TIMES

House Republicans last night cut back their proposed ethics changes, scrapping plans to allow party members under indictment to hold party leadership posts and to change House rules to require a higher standard of wrongdoing to chastise any member.

The changes came during a closed-door Republican debate of the proposed House rules for the 109th Congress. The full House will vote on the rules package today.

With the backing of House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert of Illinois and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas, House Republicans unexpectedly reversed a caucus rule change, made late last year, giving the party's steering committee discretion on whether an indicted leader stays or goes.

Mr. DeLay is under investigation by an Austin grand jury over fund raising in Texas politics, a probe he has dismissed as a partisan effort to use House ethics rules to force him out as majority leader.

Republicans agreed to return to their old caucus rule, which requires a party leader to relinquish his leadership post automatically if indicted.

Mr. DeLay said his party reversed last year's decision in order "to take it off the table."

A House Republican leadership aide said Democrats were planning to raise the issue during today's floor debate and Republicans wanted to prevent that.

"The Democrats are using the politics of personal destruction and we're not going to play their game," Mr. DeLay said.

Rep. Mark Steven Kirk, Illinois Republican, said, "It's a mark of a leader to take a bullet for the team and not for the team to take a bullet for the leader. I'm very glad we decided to stick with the rules."

Also, party leaders reversed themselves on ethics by scrapping a proposed change in the House rules to require that all members comply only with all applicable laws, regulations and rules.

Under current rules, the ethics panel can chastise a member for conduct that reflects poorly on the House, even if that conduct does not break laws or House rules - as happened to Mr. DeLay last year.

Republican leaders said members didn't like the proposed change.

"After talking to our members ... I think it was the wisest thing to do," Mr. Hastert said.

Late last night, Republicans approved a rules change that would require a majority vote of the evenly divided committee to proceed with an investigation, meaning at least one member of a congressman's own party would have to approve any probe. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

House Republicans Ditch Ethics Plans; Refuse to 'Give Democrats an Issue'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.