Corporate Tax Harmonization for the Single Market: What the European Union Is Thinking; Bottom-Line Issues for American Business
McLure, Charles E., Jr., Business Economics
When corporations operate in several jurisdictions that impose income taxes, it is necessary to divide taxable income among them. The Commission of the European Communities proposes that the European Union shift from individual national accounting to dividing the income of groups of corporations operating in multiple EU Member States according to an agreed formula. Adoption of the Commission's proposals, politically difficult because EU tax rules require unanimous approval, would have important implications for American corporations operating in the EU. These could include simplification, the ability to offset losses incurred in one Member State against profits earned in another, greater neutrality toward corporate form and cross-border reorganizations, reduced double taxation, perhaps lower tax liabilities, and greater opportunities for expansion into and within the EU. The proposals, however, would also entail transition costs, reduced opportunities for tax planning, and greater uncertainty regarding tax treaty issues.
This paper describes and appraises the Commission's proposals and their implications for U.S. firms. (1)
When a group of affiliated corporations operates in more than one nation or state that imposes an income tax, it is necessary to divide the taxable income of the group among the taxing jurisdictions. The American states employ formulas to "apportion" the income of multi-state corporations among the states where they do business. By comparison, the Member States of the European Union (EU), like other nations, currently employ separate accounting to determine the income of each member of a corporate group and "source rules" to attribute that income to the Member States where the income is deemed to originate. Inherent in that approach is reliance on arm's length prices--prices that would prevail in transactions with unrelated parties--to value transactions between members of the corporate group. But using separate accounting and the arm's length standard (hereinafter SA/ALS) in the context of an integrated market such as the U.S. or the EU is complex and impedes efforts to create a single market. The Commission of the European Communities (hereinafter the Commission), the executive body of the EU, has recently proposed that the Member States of the EU consider shifting to formula apportionment (FA) to divide the consolidated income of groups of EU corporations operating in more than one Member State among those Member States. See Commission of the European Communities (2001, 2002) and Diemer and Neale (2004).
If adopted, the Commission's proposals would have important implications, both positive and negative, for American corporations doing business in the EU. On the positive side, tax compliance would be vastly simpler, losses incurred in one Member State could be offset against profits earned in another, taxation would no longer dictate organizational form or discourage economically rational reorganizations, there would be less double taxation, increased tax competition among Member States might result in lower taxes, and there would be increased opportunities for American firms to expand into or within the EU. On the other hand, there would be transition costs, reduced opportunities for tax-motivated income shifting between Member States, and uncertainty regarding treaty issues.
Problems of SA/ALS
The economic integration of the EU will make the continued use of SA/ALS to divide the EU-source income of corporate groups increasingly problematical: (2)
* The need to comply with 25 national tax systems creates overwhelming complexity and excessive compliance costs;
* The need to distinguish between types of income and determine the geographic source of each is an important source of compliance costs;
* The growing number of transactions between affiliated corporations increases costs of compliance and …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Corporate Tax Harmonization for the Single Market: What the European Union Is Thinking; Bottom-Line Issues for American Business. Contributors: McLure, Charles E., Jr. - Author. Journal title: Business Economics. Volume: 39. Issue: 4 Publication date: October 2004. Page number: 28+. © 1999 The National Association of Business Economists. COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.