Weapons of Mass Upliftment: Good Governance, Quality Education, and Sustainable Development

Manila Bulletin, February 4, 2005 | Go to article overview

Weapons of Mass Upliftment: Good Governance, Quality Education, and Sustainable Development


(Speech delivered by Former President FIDEL V. RAMOS, Chairman, Ramos Peace and Development Foundation (RPDEV).)

AS we all know, citizenship is neither a part-time job nor a hobby: It is an everyday obligation. Concerned citizens like you and me and our national and local leaders must, therefore, work harder than ever before to create more powerful Weapons of Mass Upliftment (WMUs) to be applied against our real enemies, foremost of which are poverty, disunity, greed, selfishness, corruption, laziness and complacency. Our WMUs begin with quality education, good governance, teamwork, creativity, innovation, information technology (I.T.), pro-action (justin-time or JIT delivery), international cooperation, and other people-empowering reforms that will lead to our countrys greater competitiveness and sustainable development in the fast-changing world of the 21st century.

Our shared vision of a better quality of life for all Filipinos could be put within reach if our leaders in the executive, legislative, judicial and private sectors perform as they pray and pray as they perform, and arm our people with WMUs.

Over these past six years, we Filipinos have fallen low in world ratings.

Once we Filipinos were the model for all Southeast Asia. Our nationalist revolution sparked by Emilio Aguinaldo led to colonial Asias first free and sovereign Republic more than 100 years ago. And there was a time during the mid1950s when we seemed headed for longterm economic success.

But, in 1981, our neighbor Thailand passed us by. Right now, the average Thai is three times as rich as the average Filipino and Thai leaders envision their country being fullydeveloped by 2015 only 10 years from now.

Why have we Filipinos fallen so low? The findings of a prestigious think tank the International Institute for Management Development of Switzerland (IIMD) may show why. Every year, IIMD carries out competitiveness surveys of 60 selected developing and developed countries. These surveys suggest how the Philippines has gone down in recent years.

Last year, 2004 was the fifth straight year of decline for our country, starting in 2000 with a ranking of 35 in a field of 60. In 2002, we ranked number 40. In 2003, we dropped to number 49.

The Philippines is currently ranked the worst of the 60 countries in terms of certain key parameters in teacherpupil ratio, in pollution control, and in the ability to transport goods to the market. In government efficiency, which measures the extent to which government policies and practices are favorable to competitiveness, we fell from number 38 to 42. The Philippines ranked 52nd in business legislation and institutional frameworks meaning its rules and policies are not as investor-friendly as those of other countries in the survey.

Our combination of strengths and weaknesses

But what is really worth our attention is what the IIMD Report reveals about our countrys curious combination of strengths and weaknesses.

The Report says our competitive strength lies primarily in our workpeople. The IIMD rates us "number 1" among all the 60 countries in the availability of skilled workers. And it rates us "3rd" in the availability of senior managers; "4th" in people skilled in information-andcomputer technology; "10th" in accounting and financial skills; and "12th" in qualified engineers.

Our competitive weaknesses, on the other hand, lie in the prevalence of tax evasion; our poor infrastructure; and the level of corruption in government. In corruption, the IIMD ranks the Philippines as "2nd" from the bottom.

In short, the IIMD Report confirms what most of us knows fully well, and that is: Our countrys strengths are peoples strengths. But our countrys weaknesses are governments weaknesses.

Since our workpeople, our senior managers, and our information-and-communications technologists have the reputation of being among the best in the world, the logical but alarming conclusion is that the primary blocks to our global competitiveness are governments dysfunctions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Weapons of Mass Upliftment: Good Governance, Quality Education, and Sustainable Development
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.