American Civil Service Reform: Using France as a Model to Develop Administrative Statesmen in the Senior Executive Service

By Haraway, William M.,, III; Haraway, Dana L. | International Social Science Review, Fall-Winter 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

American Civil Service Reform: Using France as a Model to Develop Administrative Statesmen in the Senior Executive Service


Haraway, William M.,, III, Haraway, Dana L., International Social Science Review


Introduction

The American federal civil service has a long history of reform. (1) From the passage of the Pendleton Act of 1883 to the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) of 1978, the American federal personnel system has steadily evolved within the context of constitutional, political, and historical limitations. (2) Architects of the CSRA relied heavily on academic theory, examination of the British civil service, and private sector practices. (3) Despite mixed reviews, the general consensus is that it has been less than successful, particularly the Senior Executive Service (SES). (4) This legacy, together with the passage of The Department of Homeland Security Act of 2002, has produced renewed calls for civil service and SES reform.

This study attempts to broaden the scope of the current reform debate by examining the SES's present and future role in developing administrative statesmen, career senior executives who possess a unique capacity to define and pursue the public interest through their legitimate use of administrative discretion. (5) It first examines the defining foundational characteristics of the SES and reviews critical evaluations of its success. It then explores salient French institutions and practices that promote the development of French administrative statesmen who form an "elite corps" of trained experts that work closely with top politicians, manage the ministries, and compose the government. (6) Next, it offers a selective comparison between the American SES and French Higher Civil Service that reveals the most significant differences are structure and conceptions of the public interest. (7) This study then briefly addresses the most recent attempt to reform the American civil service, The Department of Homeland Security Act of 2002, which seeks to further privatize federal jobs and politicize the career SES, thus exacerbating the ability of career senior executives to function as administrative statesmen. It then suggests that the original design of the SES was fundamentally flawed. As a consequence, the wisdom and values of career SES executives are suppressed, obviating their unique ability to uniformly define and execute the public interest as administrative statesmen. Finally, selective adaptation and integration of those French institutional practices that seem useful to reforming the American federal civil service and the SES are discussed. (8)

American Senior Executive Service

As an integral feature of the CSRA, the SES represents a complete reform of merit. (9) Although previous attempts to reform the American higher public service met with significant opposition, stakeholders such as members of Congress, interest groups, administration officials, and senior executives "were encouraged to see in the SES what they wanted to see." (10) The SES strategically positions most top-level executives and experienced managers under the direct control of political executives. (11) Its design represents a presidentialist, or integrationist, bias that portrays administrative agencies and agency heads as unilaterally responsible to the chief executive within a hierarchical, pyramidal executive branch. It is thus understandable that "the professional and public administration community, with few exceptions, strongly endorsed the inclusion of political appointees and careerists in one system." (12) In principle, this support was instrumental to the Carter administration's calculated effort to increase direct political control over the federal civil service. (13)

Key provisions of the CSRA and the SES provide the chief executive with prodigious flexibility to exercise political leadership by making career senior executives more accountable to presidential responsiveness through politically-appointed superiors. The act consolidated all GS 16-18 positions and Levels IV and V of the Executive Schedule into the SES. It abolished position classification for senior executive jobs and established a rank-in-person, or "generalist," system.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

American Civil Service Reform: Using France as a Model to Develop Administrative Statesmen in the Senior Executive Service
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?